Aug 19, 2026 · 26 min · 9 segments
What does AI actually do to the people building the physical world around you? In this compilation of Why Design, ten hardware practitioners share the belief that sits at the heart of good AI use: it…
All three of those examples are real, but the same guests and others are equally direct about where the technology falls short and why the easy comparisons to other tools do not quite hold up.
I've not found LLMs particularly transformative because a lot of what I need to do, I need to do the process to solve the problem.
If
I can write it in a prompt, I've solved the problem.
But it's harder to do it in text for me than it is just to go and build it.
you know, good designers are just people who can articulate why that quality is good to someone who maybe can't, can kind of sense it, but can't see it in definitive terms.
I just don't see how an LLM is going to do that.
I worry on being, oh no, I'll never take my job.
I can't
find
a
bloody invoice in my inbox at the
moment.
We're still fine with it in terms of where it fits and why.
And yeah, like you said, how you control it to make sure you get the output and steer it in the process.
But yeah, it's like two things at the same time for me.
It's like near term, like you said, how you leverage it from like a prompting generation, supporting process point of view.
And then longer term, like it's this anticipation that, yeah, say it becomes a genetic and, can work 24-7 and run tasks without continuous input or supervision.
What that looks like is like a whole...
I think at that point, it also becomes... almost collaboration potentially as well it's hard to see and like hard to like know but like if it genuinely gets to like AGI level intelligence then then yeah there's no reason why I wouldn't become more of a collaborator and that's going to be a whole other thing and again I just make I just feel quite thankful we're not a huge company because I think it's going to be massively disruptful basically the bigger you are and I do believe that like design will exist beyond where AI is going.
Like, I just don't think it will change.
But I'd be more worried if I was in like digital design or UX, UI.
And I think you look back over here, it's like the physicality and meaning we put into objects.
has existed since we've existed and i don't think we're suddenly gonna not care about human meaning and how that's represented in three-dimensional form so yeah personally not worried but i would probably arguably be more worried if i was more digitally leaning
All three of those examples are real, but the same guests and others are equally direct about where the technology falls short and why the easy comparisons to other tools do not quite hold up.
I've not found LLMs particularly transformative because a lot of what I need to do, I need to do the process to solve the problem.
If
I can write it in a prompt, I've solved the problem.
But it's harder to do it in text for me than it is just to go and build it.
you know, good designers are just people who can articulate why that quality is good to someone who maybe can't, can kind of sense it, but can't see it in definitive terms.
I just don't see how an LLM is going to do that.
I worry on being, oh no, I'll never take my job.
I can't
find
a
bloody invoice in my inbox at the
moment.
We're still fine with it in terms of where it fits and why.
And yeah, like you said, how you control it to make sure you get the output and steer it in the process.
But yeah, it's like two things at the same time for me.
It's like near term, like you said, how you leverage it from like a prompting generation, supporting process point of view.
And then longer term, like it's this anticipation that, yeah, say it becomes a genetic and, can work 24-7 and run tasks without continuous input or supervision.
What that looks like is like a whole...
I think at that point, it also becomes... almost collaboration potentially as well it's hard to see and like hard to like know but like if it genuinely gets to like AGI level intelligence then then yeah there's no reason why I wouldn't become more of a collaborator and that's going to be a whole other thing and again I just make I just feel quite thankful we're not a huge company because I think it's going to be massively disruptful basically the bigger you are and I do believe that like design will exist beyond where AI is going.
Like, I just don't think it will change.
But I'd be more worried if I was in like digital design or UX, UI.
And I think you look back over here, it's like the physicality and meaning we put into objects.
has existed since we've existed and i don't think we're suddenly gonna not care about human meaning and how that's represented in three-dimensional form so yeah personally not worried but i would probably arguably be more worried if i was more digitally leaning
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.