Oct 23, 2026 · 48 min · 14 segments
Amanda Natividad, VP of Marketing at SparkToro and the Marketer who coined "zero-click content," is back for round 2 to talk about taste. Everyone says great Marketing takes taste, or that taste is…
That's actually a very big question because this goes back to why is this happening? You know, like, why has there been this rise in zero-click marketing? Why is it more effective? And it's because of...
It's a lot of things at play, right? Like one is the social media networks will suppress your reach if you put in a link, right? Twitter confirmed this when they said, when Elon Musk acquired that platform and then showed the algorithm and showed that posts with links are coded as definite spam vector, right? It's already suppressed there.
LinkedIn has said before, we don't deprioritize posts with links, but we prioritize posts that don't have links.
And they've even, and some people have even shown or, you know, taken screenshots, which shows in their console at like, like your post has a link.
I mean, that's not the exact verbiage and you can look this up in a social media today article.
But it's now it's, it's advising like meta is actually advising people to not put posts in their captions, but rather to put it like in the follow-up comment to their post, right? So the social platforms are kind of starting to admit to this.
And what I'll say here is, this isn't even the rest of the argument, but what I'll say already here is, well, if you know your link is going to suppress the post, then you already know that fewer people are going to see it.
So what's the point? You know, like it's, why be so insistent on tracking your posts, tracking those clicks when you're going to kill your reach anyway, you know? The other reason is the issue of dark social, where we have found, we did this research in SparkToro like last year, which is when we found that most of the social networks will hide full referral strings, which means that even if you do get a click, then let's say you get a click from TikTok, then that traffic is gonna be marked as direct, which means you wouldn't even see the click anyway.
So all that to say is you're If you're insistent on posting links in all your social content, right, you're going to kill your reach.
So what I'll say now is that's where we're going to see this return to some of those early digital era KPIs of like impressions, right? I test this all the time in LinkedIn, for instance.
I know that if I have a post without a link, I'm going to get at least three times, if not nine times, the reach compared to when I do put a link in the post.
optimize to get seen and then make sure that you're driving home value to your prospects, your customers, so that over time they'll remember you, they'll trust you and then they'll convert when they're ready to buy.
That's actually a very big question because this goes back to why is this happening? You know, like, why has there been this rise in zero-click marketing? Why is it more effective? And it's because of...
It's a lot of things at play, right? Like one is the social media networks will suppress your reach if you put in a link, right? Twitter confirmed this when they said, when Elon Musk acquired that platform and then showed the algorithm and showed that posts with links are coded as definite spam vector, right? It's already suppressed there.
LinkedIn has said before, we don't deprioritize posts with links, but we prioritize posts that don't have links.
And they've even, and some people have even shown or, you know, taken screenshots, which shows in their console at like, like your post has a link.
I mean, that's not the exact verbiage and you can look this up in a social media today article.
But it's now it's, it's advising like meta is actually advising people to not put posts in their captions, but rather to put it like in the follow-up comment to their post, right? So the social platforms are kind of starting to admit to this.
And what I'll say here is, this isn't even the rest of the argument, but what I'll say already here is, well, if you know your link is going to suppress the post, then you already know that fewer people are going to see it.
So what's the point? You know, like it's, why be so insistent on tracking your posts, tracking those clicks when you're going to kill your reach anyway, you know? The other reason is the issue of dark social, where we have found, we did this research in SparkToro like last year, which is when we found that most of the social networks will hide full referral strings, which means that even if you do get a click, then let's say you get a click from TikTok, then that traffic is gonna be marked as direct, which means you wouldn't even see the click anyway.
So all that to say is you're If you're insistent on posting links in all your social content, right, you're going to kill your reach.
So what I'll say now is that's where we're going to see this return to some of those early digital era KPIs of like impressions, right? I test this all the time in LinkedIn, for instance.
I know that if I have a post without a link, I'm going to get at least three times, if not nine times, the reach compared to when I do put a link in the post.
optimize to get seen and then make sure that you're driving home value to your prospects, your customers, so that over time they'll remember you, they'll trust you and then they'll convert when they're ready to buy.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.