If you have leprosy, there's a whole procedure about the Kohen inspecting it, declaring that you're Tameh.
There might be the seven-day quarantine periods, etc., etc.
Now, if it is smaller than the size of a bean, you are Tahor.
Why doesn't everybody just go and cut the leprosy off their skin and become Tahor? You can't do that.
That's an Isur Doraita.
The Torah says, pen v'al, one of these l'shonot by the Pasuk about Beheret, to teach you that you cannot cut it.
So now the question is, if you did cut it, when do you become Tahor? So this is Machloket Rabbi Eliezer and Chachamim.
Rabbi Eliezer said that if you did it intentionally, you have to wait for another affliction to develop and to become Tahor.
And then, once that one, that second one, comes into your tahor, you also become tahor from the first one, that no longer exists because you cut it off.
Chachamim say no, you only become tahor once your whole body is covered in leprosy, because there's a special halakh in the Torah that if your whole body is covered in leprosy, you're actually tahor.
Or, if this initial leprosy, that you're cut, was smaller than the size of a bean when you cut it.
Chachamim are very, very stringent here.
When Rabbi Eliezer said, When he develops another affliction, he becomes tahor? Is it he becomes tahor? Or is it and then he becomes tahor? Meaning, do you say, is the knas, is the fine, that you become tahor from the first affliction once you immediately see a second affliction, even if the second affliction doesn't become healed? Or is it like I've been explaining until now that no, the second affliction needs to become and to be healed, and then you become healed from the first one.
It's a find, so you could argue either way.
But what is the difference? He explains, at the end of the day, you're going to be tummy either way.
Once the second Sarah develops, You'll have to wait for that tzara to go away, or to be declared tahor by the Kohen, for you to become tahor from tzara.
So either way, you're a tzara.
What's the difference? No, no.
A groom who had an affliction, cut it, even though you shouldn't have, and then developed a second affliction.
Why? Because we have a mission.
We give him.
Remember, I need to make this point clear.
If you have leprosy, there's a whole procedure about the Kohen inspecting it, declaring that you're Tameh.
There might be the seven-day quarantine periods, etc., etc.
Now, if it is smaller than the size of a bean, you are Tahor.
Why doesn't everybody just go and cut the leprosy off their skin and become Tahor? You can't do that.
That's an Isur Doraita.
The Torah says, pen v'al, one of these l'shonot by the Pasuk about Beheret, to teach you that you cannot cut it.
So now the question is, if you did cut it, when do you become Tahor? So this is Machloket Rabbi Eliezer and Chachamim.
Rabbi Eliezer said that if you did it intentionally, you have to wait for another affliction to develop and to become Tahor.
And then, once that one, that second one, comes into your tahor, you also become tahor from the first one, that no longer exists because you cut it off.
Chachamim say no, you only become tahor once your whole body is covered in leprosy, because there's a special halakh in the Torah that if your whole body is covered in leprosy, you're actually tahor.
Or, if this initial leprosy, that you're cut, was smaller than the size of a bean when you cut it.
Chachamim are very, very stringent here.
When Rabbi Eliezer said, When he develops another affliction, he becomes tahor? Is it he becomes tahor? Or is it and then he becomes tahor? Meaning, do you say, is the knas, is the fine, that you become tahor from the first affliction once you immediately see a second affliction, even if the second affliction doesn't become healed? Or is it like I've been explaining until now that no, the second affliction needs to become and to be healed, and then you become healed from the first one.
It's a find, so you could argue either way.
But what is the difference? He explains, at the end of the day, you're going to be tummy either way.
Once the second Sarah develops, You'll have to wait for that tzara to go away, or to be declared tahor by the Kohen, for you to become tahor from tzara.
So either way, you're a tzara.
What's the difference? No, no.
A groom who had an affliction, cut it, even though you shouldn't have, and then developed a second affliction.
Why? Because we have a mission.
We give him.
Remember, I need to make this point clear.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.