Sep 27, 2026 · 48 min · 8 segments
Show notes In keeping with our tradition of breaking with tradition, this month’s episode covers a single thing, in two parts. Liz and Dany have a good hard look at the High Court challenge to…
Elizabeth HandsleyHost
Daniel ArchieHostThis segment is going to explain the submissions that the plaintiffs have put in in the cases of Digital Freedom Project and Commonwealth eSafety Commissioner and Minister for Communications and Reddit and Commonwealth eSafety Commissioner and Minister for Communications.
And the two plaintiffs in the separate cases are the Digital Freedom Project and Reddit.

And so just perhaps off the top, we should mention that both these cases started off as separate cases, but the High Court has recently determined that because they pretty much cover the same questions and the same issues and the same parties are involved in terms of the defendants, that they've decided to join them and hear them together.
And if you read the written submissions of each side, you'll see they cross-reference each other.
They know what each other are saying, and so there's some doubling up there of ideas.
But we also need to make it clear that what we're talking about here is just one side's arguments.
It's only the plaintiffs and the defendants will be putting in their defence soon.

So the key issue in these cases is the implied freedom of political communication.

And we often hear about the implied or we hear about the right for adults to have free speech.

This segment is going to explain the submissions that the plaintiffs have put in in the cases of Digital Freedom Project and Commonwealth eSafety Commissioner and Minister for Communications and Reddit and Commonwealth eSafety Commissioner and Minister for Communications.
And the two plaintiffs in the separate cases are the Digital Freedom Project and Reddit.

And so just perhaps off the top, we should mention that both these cases started off as separate cases, but the High Court has recently determined that because they pretty much cover the same questions and the same issues and the same parties are involved in terms of the defendants, that they've decided to join them and hear them together.
And if you read the written submissions of each side, you'll see they cross-reference each other.
They know what each other are saying, and so there's some doubling up there of ideas.
But we also need to make it clear that what we're talking about here is just one side's arguments.
It's only the plaintiffs and the defendants will be putting in their defence soon.

So the key issue in these cases is the implied freedom of political communication.

And we often hear about the implied or we hear about the right for adults to have free speech.

The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.