Sanjeev HadaGuest
Aaron OpdykeHost
Chu Thi Ngoc AnhGuest
So Sanjeev, drawing on some of your experience, we're at a really critical juncture and there's been this political you know, challenge of trying to look at how do we mobilize funding to address climate resilience and particularly around the housing sector? I think we're seeing a lot of donors starting to pull out of that in terms of their trajectory.

So what's happening at the moment? And can you give us a snapshot, a picture? So why is today's conversation in this episode? You know, why is it necessary to ensure that housing doesn't just become an afterthought in in how we're thinking about climate change adaptation and climate solutions?

Definitely housing cannot be an afterthought or an intervention that is carried only after post disasters.

And it is quite understandable because construction of a house is very complex.

It's challenging, it's difficult, it requires a lot of planning from design stages to community consultations, to budgets, to technical specifications, standards, quality, monitoring.

Contractor-driven models, owner-driven models, trainings and costs, budgets around that.

In addition, the outreach by building a house is also quite minimal because when you build a house, let's say, for example, if you build one house, you're only serving a family of... five or six people in a family.

But when you, the outreach to serving the outcomes from the housing in things like livelihoods, education, health, and all of these initiatives, the outreach is much larger at a scale.

And I think that is also one of the reasons why donors may be pulling out because the outreach is much larger there reaching out to more community members.

And at Habitat right now, what we are trying to do is we're trying to promote the wider impact of housing that brings positive outcomes on the family's well-beings.

It brings opportunities in livelihoods that generates income opportunities for the families.

Health risks are minimized, improves education for children, improves living condition, provides protection, safety, provides thermal comfort, and provides status and recognition within their communities.

And we hope we'll be able to generate that level of interest and be an eye-opener to the donor and to the other stakeholders as well.

I think some of those wider impacts that you're talking about, We often don't think about that for housing, livelihoods or the way in which it facilitates our social connections.

For low-income families, the home obviously, as you mentioned, it's not just where they sleep.

So Sanjeev, drawing on some of your experience, we're at a really critical juncture and there's been this political you know, challenge of trying to look at how do we mobilize funding to address climate resilience and particularly around the housing sector? I think we're seeing a lot of donors starting to pull out of that in terms of their trajectory.

So what's happening at the moment? And can you give us a snapshot, a picture? So why is today's conversation in this episode? You know, why is it necessary to ensure that housing doesn't just become an afterthought in in how we're thinking about climate change adaptation and climate solutions?

Definitely housing cannot be an afterthought or an intervention that is carried only after post disasters.

And it is quite understandable because construction of a house is very complex.

It's challenging, it's difficult, it requires a lot of planning from design stages to community consultations, to budgets, to technical specifications, standards, quality, monitoring.

Contractor-driven models, owner-driven models, trainings and costs, budgets around that.

In addition, the outreach by building a house is also quite minimal because when you build a house, let's say, for example, if you build one house, you're only serving a family of... five or six people in a family.

But when you, the outreach to serving the outcomes from the housing in things like livelihoods, education, health, and all of these initiatives, the outreach is much larger at a scale.

And I think that is also one of the reasons why donors may be pulling out because the outreach is much larger there reaching out to more community members.

And at Habitat right now, what we are trying to do is we're trying to promote the wider impact of housing that brings positive outcomes on the family's well-beings.

It brings opportunities in livelihoods that generates income opportunities for the families.

Health risks are minimized, improves education for children, improves living condition, provides protection, safety, provides thermal comfort, and provides status and recognition within their communities.

And we hope we'll be able to generate that level of interest and be an eye-opener to the donor and to the other stakeholders as well.

I think some of those wider impacts that you're talking about, We often don't think about that for housing, livelihoods or the way in which it facilitates our social connections.

For low-income families, the home obviously, as you mentioned, it's not just where they sleep.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.