Sep 9, 2026 · 58 min · 13 segments
In this episode, Dr. Andy Cutler speaks with Dr. Tim Wilens about the complex relationship between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and substance use disorders. They discuss how to…
Timothy WilensGuest
Andrew CutlerHost
And you're right, in my experience, people with a history of substance abuse don't want to jeopardize the recovery generally, and we'll be pretty forthcoming with you about that.

There's a lot of, even as I go and talk to other providers as you do around the country, there's still a lot of reluctance to prescribe stimulants independent of this issue we're talking about.

But it reminds me of our good friend Roger McIntyre talks about the implementation gap.

And the lack of applying evidence-based medicine, and my gosh, Tim, look at the evidence you're dropping on our audience like a bomb here.

The evidence base says in appropriate patients with shared decision-making, there's no reason you should be reluctant to use a stimulant.

As you said, even patients who are relatively recently in recovery, as long as they're in treatment programs, that's really important.

If you look at the different clinical trials, and again, you've done half of them.

But a lot of the clinical trials done in ADHD had exclusion for people coming with substance use, but six months a year.

But they also included a fair number of people with past histories of substance use.

And we began, this is one of those papers that I never wrote that I wish I had written, a study that looked at, we did an analysis looking at, does past history of substance use you know, up to a year, because that seemed to be the standard metric, increased the likelihood for any breakthrough substance use after treatment with stimulus or non-stimulus.

So, for people in past histories, not a problem if you used a stimulant or non-stimulus.

These are clinical trials, etc., We're re-examining that now in electronic health records.

And you're right, in my experience, people with a history of substance abuse don't want to jeopardize the recovery generally, and we'll be pretty forthcoming with you about that.

There's a lot of, even as I go and talk to other providers as you do around the country, there's still a lot of reluctance to prescribe stimulants independent of this issue we're talking about.

But it reminds me of our good friend Roger McIntyre talks about the implementation gap.

And the lack of applying evidence-based medicine, and my gosh, Tim, look at the evidence you're dropping on our audience like a bomb here.

The evidence base says in appropriate patients with shared decision-making, there's no reason you should be reluctant to use a stimulant.

As you said, even patients who are relatively recently in recovery, as long as they're in treatment programs, that's really important.

If you look at the different clinical trials, and again, you've done half of them.

But a lot of the clinical trials done in ADHD had exclusion for people coming with substance use, but six months a year.

But they also included a fair number of people with past histories of substance use.

And we began, this is one of those papers that I never wrote that I wish I had written, a study that looked at, we did an analysis looking at, does past history of substance use you know, up to a year, because that seemed to be the standard metric, increased the likelihood for any breakthrough substance use after treatment with stimulus or non-stimulus.

So, for people in past histories, not a problem if you used a stimulant or non-stimulus.

These are clinical trials, etc., We're re-examining that now in electronic health records.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.