Okay, the headline one is in Victoria.
On the 12th of August this year, Legalized Cannabis Victoria MP Rachel Payne, shout out to you, you're amazing, led a parliamentary push for the plebiscite, a direct public vote on legalizing personal cannabis possession and cultivation in Victoria, backed by polling showing that roughly 80% of public support for the reform.
It was co-supported by her colleague, David Edershank, and it picked up support from the Greens, the Libertarians and the Animal Justice Party.
But, surprise surprise, it was voted down by Labor and the Coalition.
Look, I'm not going to spin that as a win because it was a loss, but almost 4,000 Victorians are still arrested for cannabis possession every year, carrying consequences that follow people into housing applications, job interviews, and custody arrangements.
Consequences that wildly disproportionately actually aren't appropriate for the actual harm involved.
Payne's argument in the chamber was essentially nearly every politician she's spoken to privately agrees that the reform is overdue.
They just lack the political nerve to vote for it publicly.
Cannabis covering the defeat described the mood as one of furious agreement, total private consensus, but total public paralysis.
So why am I telling you this in a Hope episode? Because the plebiscite bill got a full, serious parliamentary debate at all.
Because the ACT actually used this exact same mechanism, the plebiscite, as a pathway to decriminalising cannabis back in 2020, and then all the drugs in 2023.
And because the argument is now being made in the room where laws get made, with real numbers behind it, rather than only in op-eds.
Look, losses like this one are usually how the next attempt gets built.
That's not, you know, a consolidation prize thinking.
That's just how slow policy change actually works.
But I think it's worth naming so we don't make the mistake not yet or for never because it is happening and for the wonderful work of these politicians.
Politicians that actually get us and are working class and yeah, I think it's wonderful.
I think it's good news we're moving forward.
Now, in New South Wales, we're in the process of legislating medicinal cannabis driving reform.
Like, fucking hell, like, finally? Like, someone, please help us.
Like, this means that patients who are prescribed cannabis and test under the legal THC threshold won't automatically face driving charges or drug driving charges just for having a therapeutic dose in their system, provided they're registered for their prescription and have completed the required training.
That's a direct result of years of advocacy, can I just say, including from the industry campaign called Road to Reform, which surveyed thousands of patients and found overwhelming support for exactly this change.
And look, obviously this doesn't fix the drug driving law everywhere, but it's a real practical shift for patients who have been living with this absurd reality of losing their license over a legally prescribed medication.
It's just freaking wild.
Okay, the headline one is in Victoria.
On the 12th of August this year, Legalized Cannabis Victoria MP Rachel Payne, shout out to you, you're amazing, led a parliamentary push for the plebiscite, a direct public vote on legalizing personal cannabis possession and cultivation in Victoria, backed by polling showing that roughly 80% of public support for the reform.
It was co-supported by her colleague, David Edershank, and it picked up support from the Greens, the Libertarians and the Animal Justice Party.
But, surprise surprise, it was voted down by Labor and the Coalition.
Look, I'm not going to spin that as a win because it was a loss, but almost 4,000 Victorians are still arrested for cannabis possession every year, carrying consequences that follow people into housing applications, job interviews, and custody arrangements.
Consequences that wildly disproportionately actually aren't appropriate for the actual harm involved.
Payne's argument in the chamber was essentially nearly every politician she's spoken to privately agrees that the reform is overdue.
They just lack the political nerve to vote for it publicly.
Cannabis covering the defeat described the mood as one of furious agreement, total private consensus, but total public paralysis.
So why am I telling you this in a Hope episode? Because the plebiscite bill got a full, serious parliamentary debate at all.
Because the ACT actually used this exact same mechanism, the plebiscite, as a pathway to decriminalising cannabis back in 2020, and then all the drugs in 2023.
And because the argument is now being made in the room where laws get made, with real numbers behind it, rather than only in op-eds.
Look, losses like this one are usually how the next attempt gets built.
That's not, you know, a consolidation prize thinking.
That's just how slow policy change actually works.
But I think it's worth naming so we don't make the mistake not yet or for never because it is happening and for the wonderful work of these politicians.
Politicians that actually get us and are working class and yeah, I think it's wonderful.
I think it's good news we're moving forward.
Now, in New South Wales, we're in the process of legislating medicinal cannabis driving reform.
Like, fucking hell, like, finally? Like, someone, please help us.
Like, this means that patients who are prescribed cannabis and test under the legal THC threshold won't automatically face driving charges or drug driving charges just for having a therapeutic dose in their system, provided they're registered for their prescription and have completed the required training.
That's a direct result of years of advocacy, can I just say, including from the industry campaign called Road to Reform, which surveyed thousands of patients and found overwhelming support for exactly this change.
And look, obviously this doesn't fix the drug driving law everywhere, but it's a real practical shift for patients who have been living with this absurd reality of losing their license over a legally prescribed medication.
It's just freaking wild.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.