Sep 23, 2026 · 32 min · 11 segments
Gene therapy has been used to treat many previously incurable conditions, like correcting deadly genetic disorders or giving children born with hearing loss the ability to hear. The field has massive…
David LiuGuest
Elliot ShearerGuest
Samantha Laine PerfasHostOne of the things that is tricky about treating these diseases is that they're so unique to each patient, and yet there are so many people affected by them.
400 million people worldwide, half of whom are children, have one of these rare diseases.
How close are we to being able to help patients like that on an individual basis?

Yeah, that's really a major hurdle and I would argue a major responsibility that societies have.

Now that we have technologies like the ones we just summarized, we should figure out how to maximize the ability of the science to reach as many patients as possible.

But in many cases, and increasingly, the barriers are less scientific and more economic or regulatory.

Or is there a reimbursement mechanism that society has established that can make sustainable efforts to treat patients like baby KJ over and over again? So your question, I think, is really important because there are many patients like baby KJ who are facing life-threatening diseases right now, for which we probably know how to correct the mutation that causes their disease and even how to deliver the gene editing agent to the right cells and how to manufacture it in a way that has a good risk-benefit ratio.

that there's a path to connect all of that science and all of that technology with the patients.

And for gene editing agents, that can still cost millions of dollars or even tens of millions of dollars.

So the conundrum is, if you have a disease as rare or a mutation that's as rare as baby KJs, it's not practical to spend millions or even tens of millions of dollars to develop that treatment if it can only treat one or five or 10 or 20 patients.

So all of this is really what motivated us to found the Center for Therapeutic Genetics, CTG.

So it's a collaboration between three nonprofit entities, the Broad Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, and Jackson Labs.

And the concept is that for the rarest of genetic diseases where industry isn't really able to develop treatments simply for this economic reason among others, it makes more sense to try to take on those diseases and help those patients when the science is already well-established in a non-profit setting.

That's the kind of change that I think ultimately will allow this newfound ability to take some control of our genetic futures to be much more widely applied than it currently is.
One of the things that is tricky about treating these diseases is that they're so unique to each patient, and yet there are so many people affected by them.
400 million people worldwide, half of whom are children, have one of these rare diseases.
How close are we to being able to help patients like that on an individual basis?

Yeah, that's really a major hurdle and I would argue a major responsibility that societies have.

Now that we have technologies like the ones we just summarized, we should figure out how to maximize the ability of the science to reach as many patients as possible.

But in many cases, and increasingly, the barriers are less scientific and more economic or regulatory.

Or is there a reimbursement mechanism that society has established that can make sustainable efforts to treat patients like baby KJ over and over again? So your question, I think, is really important because there are many patients like baby KJ who are facing life-threatening diseases right now, for which we probably know how to correct the mutation that causes their disease and even how to deliver the gene editing agent to the right cells and how to manufacture it in a way that has a good risk-benefit ratio.

that there's a path to connect all of that science and all of that technology with the patients.

And for gene editing agents, that can still cost millions of dollars or even tens of millions of dollars.

So the conundrum is, if you have a disease as rare or a mutation that's as rare as baby KJs, it's not practical to spend millions or even tens of millions of dollars to develop that treatment if it can only treat one or five or 10 or 20 patients.

So all of this is really what motivated us to found the Center for Therapeutic Genetics, CTG.

So it's a collaboration between three nonprofit entities, the Broad Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, and Jackson Labs.

And the concept is that for the rarest of genetic diseases where industry isn't really able to develop treatments simply for this economic reason among others, it makes more sense to try to take on those diseases and help those patients when the science is already well-established in a non-profit setting.

That's the kind of change that I think ultimately will allow this newfound ability to take some control of our genetic futures to be much more widely applied than it currently is.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.