Sep 28, 2026 · 1 hr 4 min · 11 segments
It's a re-release week! We're tired. Join us this week as we explore the intense geopolitical tensions of the Cold War era through the lens of military exercises and simulations. Today, we unravel…
And if something tells me the research wrapped very recently on this –
Well, listen, I have done a lot of research with this.
Let me tell you, my friend, I have read several books.
I have this document in front of me that I printed out that is recently declassified and has parts of it redacted.
Is
it spelled JFK?
No, but it does involve a partially redacted thing.
Here's the thing I want to tell you, though, in case I forget.
This is an entire page of this document.
That is redacted.
The entire page redacted.
The whole page is blacked out.
At the very bottom, it says, despite or perhaps because of its disturbing message, that is blocked out.
It tells you that this is disturbing, but you don't get to know what it is.
Is the disturbing part an editor's take who did read it or did nobody read
it? No, it's in the actual report.
This report is from 1996. from the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, February 15th, 1990.
I'm
trying to guess what this could be.
It's actually also a two-parter.
Oh, wow.
Okay, we're doing anthology.
Well, it wouldn't be anthology.
Whatever.
It's serial.
And if something tells me the research wrapped very recently on this –
Well, listen, I have done a lot of research with this.
Let me tell you, my friend, I have read several books.
I have this document in front of me that I printed out that is recently declassified and has parts of it redacted.
Is
it spelled JFK?
No, but it does involve a partially redacted thing.
Here's the thing I want to tell you, though, in case I forget.
This is an entire page of this document.
That is redacted.
The entire page redacted.
The whole page is blacked out.
At the very bottom, it says, despite or perhaps because of its disturbing message, that is blocked out.
It tells you that this is disturbing, but you don't get to know what it is.
Is the disturbing part an editor's take who did read it or did nobody read
it? No, it's in the actual report.
This report is from 1996. from the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, February 15th, 1990.
I'm
trying to guess what this could be.
It's actually also a two-parter.
Oh, wow.
Okay, we're doing anthology.
Well, it wouldn't be anthology.
Whatever.
It's serial.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.