Skip to main content
Warsaw Pact

Warsaw Pact

Search complete. 549 mentions across 167 episodes found for "Warsaw Pact".

Sep 17, 2026

Bob PackwoodSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
17:03
He says, and to the others who weren't here that day, The morning in October of 1962, when President Kennedy called Foreign Minister Gromyko into his office and asked if the Soviets had any missiles in Cuba, no.
Bob PackwoodSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
17:21
Had any Warsaw Pact country missiles been transported on Soviet ships to Cuba? No.
Bob PackwoodSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
17:27
Were there any Soviet soldiers on the ground in Cuba assembling missiles from any place? No.
Bob PackwoodSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
17:33
And then Scoop gestures like this.
Juan RosHOST
35:12
Okay.
Stacy Macris RosHOST
35:13
The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 symbolized what major geopolitical shift? Was it the victory of the Warsaw Pact over NATO? Was it the collapse of communist control in Eastern Europe? Was it the start of a major global nuclear war? Was it the division of Germany into four new nations? The second
Juan RosHOST
35:29
one.
Stacy Macris RosHOST
35:30
The collapse of communist control in Eastern
Sam MithaHOST
40:24
I don't know if I want to go into the history of why, you know, NATO, basically NATO expanding, telling Russia they're not going to expand, telling Russia they're not going to recruit more states into NATO because there's no purpose.
Sam MithaHOST
40:35
USSR, Warsaw Pact with Poland, they created an allied power to go against NATO.
Sam MithaHOST
40:42
USSR fell.
Sam MithaHOST
40:43
Now you have the Russian Federation.
LummyPANELIST
44:05
Who writes the rules for war crimes?
Bubba the Love Sponge ClemHOST
44:07
Um, NATO and the Warsaw Pact and the, just the Geneva Convention.
LummyPANELIST
44:11
Well, let's just pull war on them.
Bubba the Love Sponge ClemHOST
44:14
Well, y- y- y- G- Lummy, is there anyth- Can you help me out with him-
Emma AshfordGUEST
19:23
Um, it is entirely true, I think, that Russia probably would have had more influence on the foreign policy and even domestic politics of some of its closer neighbors.
Emma AshfordGUEST
19:34
So again, it's states like Ukraine that are the closest to Russia that were part of the Soviet Union rather than part of the Warsaw Pact.
Emma AshfordGUEST
19:41
I do think we would've seen continued Russian meddling in those cases.
Emma AshfordGUEST
19:45
But again, the argument that I would make is that for NATO as an organization, admitting some of these states did not necessarily improve the security of existing members, and for Europe as a whole, you know, you have to ask yourself, again, this is a counterfactual, would we have rather had a Europe with a major land war in Ukraine with all this, you know, these weapons being spent, these lives being spent in the biggest land war that we've had in Europe basically since World War II, or would we rather have had more of, let's say, a gray zone between Russia and the West, where some of these states perhaps did not have the full freedoms that they might have if they were members of, of NATO, but where, you know, perhaps it would not have been as prone to conflict? And I think, again, it's a, it's an unpleasant counterfactual, but it's one worth making.
Thomas777GUEST
8:27
They were literally at war with Israel, okay, as was the USSR.
Thomas777GUEST
8:31
But the DDR, not only was there a spear point, kind of like a schwerpunkt of Warsaw Pact power, you know, by proxy, especially in the Third World, but there was, in fact, like an East German foreign policy into itself.
Thomas777GUEST
8:50
And they despised Israel.
Thomas777GUEST
8:53
And they viewed them not only as a bastion of imperialism in the Leninist sense, they viewed them as an obstacle to the proletarian revolution in the Near East, which was key, owing to geostrategic factors and other things.
Thomas777GUEST
9:33
You can tell me that it wasn't, but I don't accept that.
Thomas777GUEST
9:39
The Communist Party line anyway, like what the Soviets would say, particularly when they were under pressure in the 1980s, supposedly for know anti-semitic legislation like they said that you know it's not like jews like they're like why would we why would we emphasize jewish suffering in world war ii we lost 25 million people you know like we we we vanquished the third reich like why we're not gonna we're not gonna count how to some reactionary jewish identity they just like refuse to acknowledge it you know so again you know i refer people to paul gottfried especially people who weren't alive during the Cold War.
Thomas777GUEST
10:18
Like, the left won the Cold War, but the Warsaw Pact left lost.
Thomas777GUEST
10:22
Okay, like, we're not talking about wokeism.
ThomasGUEST
7:15
They were literally at war with Israel, okay, as was the USSR.
ThomasGUEST
7:19
But the DDR, not only were they a spearpoint, kind of like a schwerpunkt, of, um, of Warsaw Pact power, you know, by proxy, especially in the third world.
ThomasGUEST
7:32
But there, there wasn't, there wasn't, there wasn't in fact like an East German, like foreign policy into itself.
ThomasGUEST
7:38
And, um, they despised Israel and, um, they, they viewed them not only as a passion of, you know, imperialism in the Leninist sense.
ThomasGUEST
8:58
You know.
ThomasGUEST
9:00
So, again, you know, I refer people to Paul Gottfried, especially people who weren't alive during the Cold War.
ThomasGUEST
9:06
Like, the left won the Cold War, but the Warsaw Pact left lost.
ThomasGUEST
9:10
Okay, like, we're not We're not talking about wokeism.
Thomas777GUEST
2:59
People didn't flippantly make these decisions.
Thomas777GUEST
3:01
And in the case of Grenada, the only way it can be understood is within the same kind of paradigm of escalation that had already been underway since detente ended and um America had taken a series of military losses I mean that's just America the entire Western alliance you know the United States NATO and allied States they can't be denied I make the point to people again and again that America was losing the Cold War in military terms when Reagan took the oath of office that that wasn't neoconish team B propaganda that wasn't just silly uh John Bircher type stuff I mean that was inarguable and it was an odd period of transition conceptually as regards how military matters were contemplated this is when the Revolution in military Affairs was underway like literally like the kind of the the the kind of discursive process and the kind of you know the the um the research that led to the technology that ultimately facilitated it and resolved some of these uncertainties was literally then underway but it wasn't yet clear you know what kind of the new force structure should be to combat warsaw pact You know, this was 1983 was exactly a decade after the draft had been abolished.
Thomas777GUEST
4:38
The military was still adjusting to that.
Thomas777GUEST
4:42
There was a fascinating paradigm underway by which strategic nuclear parity had been accomplished by the late 70s.
Thomas777GUEST
4:53
You know, that was the first time it could truly be said that there was like genuine parity between NATO and Warsaw Pact in terms of strategic nuclear forces in being.
Thomas777GUEST
5:05
Now, that had the effect of suddenly making conventional forces a lot more relevant.
Thomas777GUEST
5:11
OK, I mean, in the opinion of somebody like me, they'd always been relevant.
Thomas777GUEST
8:23
In 1971, the USSR had strongly backed India and the Indo-Pakistan War as a hedge against the People's Republic of China.
Morgan WrightGUEST
46:20
The second offset w- was called Look Deep, Shoot Deep.
Morgan WrightGUEST
46:22
It's how we kept the Warsaw Pact at bay.
Morgan WrightGUEST
46:25
But we are now into the third offset of war, and you are absolutely right.
Morgan WrightGUEST
46:28
This is one we have to win because the winner gets to define the rules.
ThomasGUEST
4:44
The research that led to the technology that ultimately facilitated it and resolved some of these uncertainties was literally then underway.
ThomasGUEST
4:54
But it wasn't yet clear what kind of the new force structure should be to combat Warsaw Pact.
ThomasGUEST
5:03
1983 was exactly a decade after the draft had been abolished.
ThomasGUEST
5:10
The military was still adjusting to that.
ThomasGUEST
5:14
There was a fascinating paradigm underway by which strategic nuclear parity had been accomplished by the late 70s.
ThomasGUEST
5:25
That was the first time it could truly be said that there was genuine parity between NATO and Warsaw Pact in terms of strategic nuclear forces in being.
ThomasGUEST
5:37
Now, that had the effect of suddenly making conventional forces a lot more relevant.
ThomasGUEST
5:43
OK, I mean, in the opinion of somebody like me, they'd always been relevant.

157 more episodes mention Warsaw Pact.

Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.