Creative Research Conversations
Sep 14, 2026 · 27 min · 10 segments
Violinist/composer, zoömusicologist, and author Dr. Hollis Taylor performs her (re)compositions of avian songs on violin alongside her environmental field recordings, and she also reimagines pied…
Hollis TaylorGuest
Kat HopeHost
I find that really interesting because a lot of scientists talk about the birdsong as a functional process to do with seasons or mating or territory.

So as an artistic researcher, because the music is so important to your understanding and reading of this birdsong, What has the art in your own research taught us about birdsongs and about ourselves?

Well, when we discuss art, of course, as you've just alluded to, we're never far from what are the differences between art and science.

So the most important thing that I bring to my study of birdsong is a trained deer.

And Biologists have told me that they often don't listen to the recordings of the birds that they study, that they rely on their trained eye to look at a sonogram, which is like a picture.

So I think scientists would be missing some things by just looking indistinguishable.

I mean, we know songbirds enlist aesthetic qualities to fulfill a practical purpose.

We know that we affirm our territory, our identity, our group, even our age, maybe especially our age through music.

So one of the ways I like to think of is the difference between the approach of music or art, say, versus science is scientists need to write papers and they need to have a succinct answer to a specific question.

In fact, we know that the advice of Duke Ellington was first you find the logical way And when you find it, avoid it.

But pied butcherbird songs, like all good music, really exceed any kind of rigid set of instructions.

do you think that tells us something about our practice of music? I mean, are there insights, I guess, that you've taken away from this understanding of birds into our understanding of music?

I find that really interesting because a lot of scientists talk about the birdsong as a functional process to do with seasons or mating or territory.

So as an artistic researcher, because the music is so important to your understanding and reading of this birdsong, What has the art in your own research taught us about birdsongs and about ourselves?

Well, when we discuss art, of course, as you've just alluded to, we're never far from what are the differences between art and science.

So the most important thing that I bring to my study of birdsong is a trained deer.

And Biologists have told me that they often don't listen to the recordings of the birds that they study, that they rely on their trained eye to look at a sonogram, which is like a picture.

So I think scientists would be missing some things by just looking indistinguishable.

I mean, we know songbirds enlist aesthetic qualities to fulfill a practical purpose.

We know that we affirm our territory, our identity, our group, even our age, maybe especially our age through music.

So one of the ways I like to think of is the difference between the approach of music or art, say, versus science is scientists need to write papers and they need to have a succinct answer to a specific question.

In fact, we know that the advice of Duke Ellington was first you find the logical way And when you find it, avoid it.

But pied butcherbird songs, like all good music, really exceed any kind of rigid set of instructions.

do you think that tells us something about our practice of music? I mean, are there insights, I guess, that you've taken away from this understanding of birds into our understanding of music?
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.