Is usage licensing dead? Not exactly. But the business it was built for doesn't really exist anymore. Print is all but gone. Social media now accounts for 80% (!) of ad spend in the US. Clients want the C word \[rhymes with shmontent] by the dump truck load and there are ten times as many people willing to shoot it.
@asksternrep, a prominent photo rep with an excellent advice page, recently posted a follower’s question on her Instagram feed and the comment section got real spicy. Her advice to photographers losing bids over usage: be the best photographer you can be, and clients will pay for limited licensing. Will they though?
We try to unpack what actually happened to the commercial photography market, why work-for-hire is the real threat, and why "hold the line on licensing" is good advice for 5% of photographers all of the time, a few more photographers some of the time, but never all photographers all of the time.
*"Telling photographers to do better is an outdated answer to a structural shift in the industry."*
**Links:**
@asksternrep — Andrea Stern’s (generally) great advice resource on Instagram
ASMP — American Society of Media Photographers
**Find us:**
Follow Jay on Instagram: @jayfram
Follow Bill on Instagram and Threads: @sawalich
Read Bill's newsletter, Art + Math: artandmath.substack.com
Jay's photography: jayfram.com
Bill's photography: sawalich.com
Write to us: [jay@jayfram.com](mailto:jay@jayfram.com) / [bill@sawalich.com](mailto:bill@sawalich.com)
Rate and review Continuous Agitation on Apple Podcasts — it actually helps.