Jun 23, 2026 · 15 min · 11 segments
Access the Calibration Test: https://www.buildingbettergames.gg/calibration-test When every team in your studio tells you they're 80% confident…
Benjamin CarcichHost
They were split into several orgs, each of which had a bunch of teams inside of them.

And I was on one of those teams and helping coordinate some of the between-team and between-org things.

And I asked the leader above me, what chance do you want my team to have of succeeding as part of this larger effort? They said 80%.

And I said, well, wait, what do you want the overall project chance of success to be with all the teams and all the orgs? And he said, 80%.

And I thought, oh, we are not taking math seriously as we're doing our percentages.

Because the reality is, if the overall project needed to be 80% likely to succeed, then The right way to get there is not to average all of the individual team's efforts.

As he realized what was happening, he said, oh my goodness, I hadn't thought of that.

And it helped him go do some things to hopefully have a higher chance of success.

But the reality is, If all those teams inside of that giant project had an 80% chance of success, the overall project probably had a chance of success well under 5%.

They tell everyone to be 80% confident and assume that that will mean that the overall project averages to be 80% confident.

What ends up happening is you have a set of teams that are all 80% confident on their own, and then the total confidence is quite a bit less.

People build in buffers, they ask about things like confidence, they think that they're taking that seriously, and in actuality, what they've basically just proven is that it's almost impossible for their project to succeed.

So what's the problem? The core problem, everybody seems reasonably confident in their little piece, and yet the whole is far more likely to fail than to succeed.

They were split into several orgs, each of which had a bunch of teams inside of them.

And I was on one of those teams and helping coordinate some of the between-team and between-org things.

And I asked the leader above me, what chance do you want my team to have of succeeding as part of this larger effort? They said 80%.

And I said, well, wait, what do you want the overall project chance of success to be with all the teams and all the orgs? And he said, 80%.

And I thought, oh, we are not taking math seriously as we're doing our percentages.

Because the reality is, if the overall project needed to be 80% likely to succeed, then The right way to get there is not to average all of the individual team's efforts.

As he realized what was happening, he said, oh my goodness, I hadn't thought of that.

And it helped him go do some things to hopefully have a higher chance of success.

But the reality is, If all those teams inside of that giant project had an 80% chance of success, the overall project probably had a chance of success well under 5%.

They tell everyone to be 80% confident and assume that that will mean that the overall project averages to be 80% confident.

What ends up happening is you have a set of teams that are all 80% confident on their own, and then the total confidence is quite a bit less.

People build in buffers, they ask about things like confidence, they think that they're taking that seriously, and in actuality, what they've basically just proven is that it's almost impossible for their project to succeed.

So what's the problem? The core problem, everybody seems reasonably confident in their little piece, and yet the whole is far more likely to fail than to succeed.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.