Annie DelgadoHostSo that was an interesting development from them on getting into this kind of more agent base for work, not just code, um, space.

Yeah, and, um, it's, it's sort of like a game changer to think about how you use, uh, um, an AI versus...

Like, we used to talk about them as assistants, right? They're your assistant helping you, but now we're talking about them as if they are like employees, right? Like, they actually can, like, take your ideas, grab all the content to generate a doc while you go off and do something different that's not guiding them step by step through having to do that or uploading new context, all of that kind of stuff.
But one says ChatGPT Work, and one says ChatGPT Codex, and so one is for work development, for coding, and one is for other kinds of work.
And chat is just like a sub-element of ChatGPT Work, so you're in work, and you can set it off on a task, and then you can also start a little chat on the side.
But it almost relegated chat to a second c- second-class citizen compared to real work in the app, and it also unified developers and just normal knowledge workers into one app experience, getting rid of the kind of Codex, ChatGPT, what app do I run to do the work I wanna do? So I thought that was a really interesting approach to how they just kind of visualized it for you.
I'm really curious to give it the same kind of large, complex tasks and see what they both come back with 'cause it's always interesting to compare.
And we have GPT 5.6 obviously we'll talk about a little bit in, um, ChatGPT Work, so I'm curious to see how those two happen.
So before, Cowork was running locally on your local files and literally using the CPU in your machine to make a bunch of calls to Claude.
So that was an interesting development from them on getting into this kind of more agent base for work, not just code, um, space.

Yeah, and, um, it's, it's sort of like a game changer to think about how you use, uh, um, an AI versus...

Like, we used to talk about them as assistants, right? They're your assistant helping you, but now we're talking about them as if they are like employees, right? Like, they actually can, like, take your ideas, grab all the content to generate a doc while you go off and do something different that's not guiding them step by step through having to do that or uploading new context, all of that kind of stuff.
But one says ChatGPT Work, and one says ChatGPT Codex, and so one is for work development, for coding, and one is for other kinds of work.
And chat is just like a sub-element of ChatGPT Work, so you're in work, and you can set it off on a task, and then you can also start a little chat on the side.
But it almost relegated chat to a second c- second-class citizen compared to real work in the app, and it also unified developers and just normal knowledge workers into one app experience, getting rid of the kind of Codex, ChatGPT, what app do I run to do the work I wanna do? So I thought that was a really interesting approach to how they just kind of visualized it for you.
I'm really curious to give it the same kind of large, complex tasks and see what they both come back with 'cause it's always interesting to compare.
And we have GPT 5.6 obviously we'll talk about a little bit in, um, ChatGPT Work, so I'm curious to see how those two happen.
So before, Cowork was running locally on your local files and literally using the CPU in your machine to make a bunch of calls to Claude.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.