Representation Changes His Standard
The hosts question America’s readiness for Buttigieg
Sep 14, 2026 · 2 hr 40 min · 41 segments
Hosts: Matt | Olivia SHOW NOTES Tonight, Matt and Olivia examine the fallout surrounding the Lindsay Clancy case, including juror comments, accusations of bias, and President Trump's response to…
Matt SpeerHost
Olivia SpeerHostspeaker_26
Jonathan SaryLauren Greenspeaker_15speaker_31speaker_21speaker_42speaker_33speaker_5speaker_17speaker_45Danaspeaker_29speaker_28
Now, beyond a reasonable doubt is designed to ensure that somebody's guilt is completely 100% certain based upon the reasonable doubt clause, which says that if any reasonable person would find based upon the evidence that this person could possibly not have done the crime, you must find them innocent.

or at least have to go ahead and consider what they're being charged with as an incorrect assignment of burden for whatever crime they did or did not commit.

So by going and saying, well, we did this because we were challenged as women to carry the torch for feminism, that's not reasonable doubt.

That is, you are using your political ideology to make a political statement through the court systems.

They may even relocate the trial to a place and ask for a relocation of the trial due to the fact of the location that they're in, may not have enough jurors who are not aware of what took place.

This is giving the prosecution a slam dunk with all of this information, and it's really helping them to appeal for a jurisdictional move.

Now, beyond a reasonable doubt is designed to ensure that somebody's guilt is completely 100% certain based upon the reasonable doubt clause, which says that if any reasonable person would find based upon the evidence that this person could possibly not have done the crime, you must find them innocent.

or at least have to go ahead and consider what they're being charged with as an incorrect assignment of burden for whatever crime they did or did not commit.

So by going and saying, well, we did this because we were challenged as women to carry the torch for feminism, that's not reasonable doubt.

That is, you are using your political ideology to make a political statement through the court systems.

They may even relocate the trial to a place and ask for a relocation of the trial due to the fact of the location that they're in, may not have enough jurors who are not aware of what took place.

This is giving the prosecution a slam dunk with all of this information, and it's really helping them to appeal for a jurisdictional move.
Every episode on Radar is fully transcribed, speaker-labeled, and rich with metadata. Here is a taste of this one. Try Radar for free to see the rest.
3 of 6
Representation Changes His Standard
The hosts question America’s readiness for Buttigieg
AI Is Not The Boogeyman
They argue AI needs accountability over protection
Social Security’s Blunt Reframing
The host bluntly calls Social Security welfare
+3 more clips · 2 min 51 sec of audio in all
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
All 6 clips — the highlight moments, each cut as its own audio, with a title and a speaker
All 41 segments — the transcript broken into labeled sections, every ad read marked
All 25 topics — jump to every other episode discussing the same subject
Every related episode — other shows Radar links to this one
No account is needed to search Radar.