The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community
Sep 15, 2026 · 16 min · 8 segments
**When can an employer be held liable for the actions of an independent contractor? And when does a contractor become so closely integrated into a business that the relationship is considered akin to…
Connie BerryGuest
Emma BurroughsHost
So today we're discussing the Court of Appeal's recent decision in Berger versus Risk Solutions and JD Wetherspoon, which is a case about employers' vicarious liability.

So before we dive into the decision, Connie, it might be useful to have a quick summary of the facts.

So Mr. Berger, in August 2018, was assaulted by two doormen, uh, door supervisors at a Wetherspoon's pub.

The doormen were employees of a company called Risk Solutions, who were engaged by Wetherspoon's to provide door security at the pub.

And the contract between, uh, Wetherspoon's and Risk Solutions was a commercial contract to provide services and made clear that the doormen were authorized to restrain customers to use reasonable force only where lawful.

It said that Risk Solutions would be responsible for the direction, management, and control of their employees and expressly agreed that Wetherspoon's was not responsible for that.

However, Wetherspoon's did have power to request r- uh, removal of a doorman in the event of a breach of agreement, but not a right to hire or fire them.

They, Wetherspoon's could specify what uniform Risk Solutions staff should wear and provided door supervisors with body cameras.

However, they did not provide any training to the doormen who had undergone specialist training and had the knowledge to decide when the use of reasonable lawful force was necessary.

So there were factors in the contract which hinted at Wetherspoon's having some control over the doormen, but ultimately it was a commercial contract between two companies.

So going back to Mr. Berger, the claimant, as I say, he was assaulted by two of these doormen in August 2018 and suffered quite serious injuries.

He subsequently brought a personal injury claim against Risk Solutions and, uh, Wetherspoon's.

By the time he filed that claim, Risk Solutions had gone into creditors' voluntary liquidation, so his PI claim was brought as against Wetherspoon's.

Okay, so essentially the question was whether Wetherspoon's were liable for the acts of the doormen, and therefore whether they were liable for the tort committed, i.e., the personal injury claim that the claimant brought.

So today we're discussing the Court of Appeal's recent decision in Berger versus Risk Solutions and JD Wetherspoon, which is a case about employers' vicarious liability.

So before we dive into the decision, Connie, it might be useful to have a quick summary of the facts.

So Mr. Berger, in August 2018, was assaulted by two doormen, uh, door supervisors at a Wetherspoon's pub.

The doormen were employees of a company called Risk Solutions, who were engaged by Wetherspoon's to provide door security at the pub.

And the contract between, uh, Wetherspoon's and Risk Solutions was a commercial contract to provide services and made clear that the doormen were authorized to restrain customers to use reasonable force only where lawful.

It said that Risk Solutions would be responsible for the direction, management, and control of their employees and expressly agreed that Wetherspoon's was not responsible for that.

However, Wetherspoon's did have power to request r- uh, removal of a doorman in the event of a breach of agreement, but not a right to hire or fire them.

They, Wetherspoon's could specify what uniform Risk Solutions staff should wear and provided door supervisors with body cameras.

However, they did not provide any training to the doormen who had undergone specialist training and had the knowledge to decide when the use of reasonable lawful force was necessary.

So there were factors in the contract which hinted at Wetherspoon's having some control over the doormen, but ultimately it was a commercial contract between two companies.

So going back to Mr. Berger, the claimant, as I say, he was assaulted by two of these doormen in August 2018 and suffered quite serious injuries.

He subsequently brought a personal injury claim against Risk Solutions and, uh, Wetherspoon's.

By the time he filed that claim, Risk Solutions had gone into creditors' voluntary liquidation, so his PI claim was brought as against Wetherspoon's.

Okay, so essentially the question was whether Wetherspoon's were liable for the acts of the doormen, and therefore whether they were liable for the tort committed, i.e., the personal injury claim that the claimant brought.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.