Sep 8, 2026 · 46 min · 11 segments
In this episode of Placecast, presenter Nicola Headlam is joined by Amy Burnett, LPIP Policy Fellow, researcher and practitioner in local governance, sustainability and community-led change. Amy…
Amy BurnettGuestNicola HeadlamHostI've always sort of struggled with the fact that there is an artificial distinction between international development practice and local practice in this country.
And I think the keeping apart of knowledges and sort of experience from international development into community development at the subnational scale in this country.
I wonder why you think that is historically? Do you have a sense of why they were separate or is it just one of those things?

Yes, I was actually writing about taking a regenerative approach to international development.

And I remember I used to work this decentralization project that I told you about.

It's very much something I've been looking at as well in terms of how do you measure this kind of stuff that I'm interested in talking about just now.

lot of the international development funding There's a lot of social good in it, but it's also been heavily driven by the objectives of foreign countries and foreign interests.

And so a lot of their indicators, and they're talking about how many mechanisms were being developed as a result of this project, etc, etc.

So I think that the political economy, although it's not obviously all about that, has kind of shaped the particular relationships in a slightly more top-down way.

Although there's a lot of learning, particularly around participation, some of the most advanced ways of kind of doing participation has been from the international development sector.

Now we have the internet, it's been able to make these community practices and particularly around the regenerative space like Echoles, which is a European regenerative movement.

And a lot of the people also kind of had some ties to a transition town, but also this kind of wider new economy approach.

So there is a slight parallel infrastructure arising from a more community-based regenerative approach to international development.

And interestingly, some of the work that I've been doing with Middlesex University, we've been looking at integrating finance and biodiversity as part of the IFB program, which is funded by NERC.

It's something that I've kind of noticed and it's been verified through this particular work that we've got setting up a nature positive accelerator in the Niger Delta.

And when I was working in Africa, it wasn't really the kind of younger entrepreneurs didn't have so much the conditions and the voice and the capacity to become like entrepreneurs for social good.

And actually, I've seen quite a few younger African based and I'm sure it's happening in many other global self.
I've always sort of struggled with the fact that there is an artificial distinction between international development practice and local practice in this country.
And I think the keeping apart of knowledges and sort of experience from international development into community development at the subnational scale in this country.
I wonder why you think that is historically? Do you have a sense of why they were separate or is it just one of those things?

Yes, I was actually writing about taking a regenerative approach to international development.

And I remember I used to work this decentralization project that I told you about.

It's very much something I've been looking at as well in terms of how do you measure this kind of stuff that I'm interested in talking about just now.

lot of the international development funding There's a lot of social good in it, but it's also been heavily driven by the objectives of foreign countries and foreign interests.

And so a lot of their indicators, and they're talking about how many mechanisms were being developed as a result of this project, etc, etc.

So I think that the political economy, although it's not obviously all about that, has kind of shaped the particular relationships in a slightly more top-down way.

Although there's a lot of learning, particularly around participation, some of the most advanced ways of kind of doing participation has been from the international development sector.

Now we have the internet, it's been able to make these community practices and particularly around the regenerative space like Echoles, which is a European regenerative movement.

And a lot of the people also kind of had some ties to a transition town, but also this kind of wider new economy approach.

So there is a slight parallel infrastructure arising from a more community-based regenerative approach to international development.

And interestingly, some of the work that I've been doing with Middlesex University, we've been looking at integrating finance and biodiversity as part of the IFB program, which is funded by NERC.

It's something that I've kind of noticed and it's been verified through this particular work that we've got setting up a nature positive accelerator in the Niger Delta.

And when I was working in Africa, it wasn't really the kind of younger entrepreneurs didn't have so much the conditions and the voice and the capacity to become like entrepreneurs for social good.

And actually, I've seen quite a few younger African based and I'm sure it's happening in many other global self.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.