Royal "Cad" Cashes In

Kevin, what are you rejoicing about? You monarchists

are really up against it.

You've got a couple of Charlies and you've now got Piers Morgan on a moral molehill lecturing us all on press standards.

What a glorious time to be alive.

Come on, come on.

You must admit that Charles Spencer... uncle of the heir to the throne, William, attacking Charles, the other Charles, King Charles III, for you, has actually thrown a grenade into a family that is shameless without servants.

If they were from council estates, not royal estates, they'd be well known to the local authorities, wouldn't they? Come on, this is absolutely dreadful.

Why should you look up to this family that is just fighting like rabid ferrets in a sack?

Well, you see, I think the first few days, I think actually the serialisation of the book in the mail was hugely damaging for King Charles.

And I thought his response was magisterial.

It was a very good response.

It echoed the late Queen.

Recollections may vary.

Talking about how fraternal grief can often blind you to what really happened.

And we shouldn't forget, by the way, Kevin, that Charles Spencer was barely on speaking terms to his sister when she died.

He declined her the particular cottage she wanted to live on on his estate when the marriage ended to the then Prince of Wales.

And in my view, this book is a rather grubby way to make money.

It obviously runs, and Prince Harry, by the way, looks like a Spencer and behaves like a Spencer because he's done exactly the same thing with his book.

This is the same side of the family at work.

But I think the book has been definitely undermined by the extraordinary blunder Spencer made over Piers Morgan.

Now, he's your former boss, Kevin.

You know what he's like.

But to say that Morgan was to assume is what he said in his apology.

The assumption that Morgan was editor of the Sunday Mirror when it published those appalling photographs of the Princess of Wales in her gym.

They were almost intimate photographs.

Kevin, what are you rejoicing about? You monarchists

are really up against it.

You've got a couple of Charlies and you've now got Piers Morgan on a moral molehill lecturing us all on press standards.

What a glorious time to be alive.

Come on, come on.

You must admit that Charles Spencer... uncle of the heir to the throne, William, attacking Charles, the other Charles, King Charles III, for you, has actually thrown a grenade into a family that is shameless without servants.

If they were from council estates, not royal estates, they'd be well known to the local authorities, wouldn't they? Come on, this is absolutely dreadful.

Why should you look up to this family that is just fighting like rabid ferrets in a sack?

Well, you see, I think the first few days, I think actually the serialisation of the book in the mail was hugely damaging for King Charles.

And I thought his response was magisterial.

It was a very good response.

It echoed the late Queen.

Recollections may vary.

Talking about how fraternal grief can often blind you to what really happened.

And we shouldn't forget, by the way, Kevin, that Charles Spencer was barely on speaking terms to his sister when she died.

He declined her the particular cottage she wanted to live on on his estate when the marriage ended to the then Prince of Wales.

And in my view, this book is a rather grubby way to make money.

It obviously runs, and Prince Harry, by the way, looks like a Spencer and behaves like a Spencer because he's done exactly the same thing with his book.

This is the same side of the family at work.

But I think the book has been definitely undermined by the extraordinary blunder Spencer made over Piers Morgan.

Now, he's your former boss, Kevin.

You know what he's like.

But to say that Morgan was to assume is what he said in his apology.

The assumption that Morgan was editor of the Sunday Mirror when it published those appalling photographs of the Princess of Wales in her gym.

They were almost intimate photographs.