Nov 1, 2026 · 18 min · 10 segments
John Yorke looks at the second half of Jonathan’s Swift’s 1726 novel Gulliver’s Travels, taking in Gulliver’s voyages to the floating island of Laputa and to the land of the Houyhnhnms. Laputa and…
David QuantickGuestRationality is still the subject, but whereas previously Swift views it through the prism of political, academic and scientific institutions,
And this is the book that people really disliked, that brought forth accusations of misanthropy.
So what happens in this fourth part is that Gulliver first meets some creatures he learns are called yahoos.
Secondly, he meets creatures called whinims, who look like horses, but they're civil, thoughtful, clean, and neat.
And this contrast between people like swarms who seem to represent the worst of humanity and horses who seem to have a very pure and stripped down sense of morality and reason is Some readers find some of the expressions of their rationality quite off-putting.
There is a radical detachment from a lot of what we tend to think often makes us human.
It's an accusation that's been made many times since, but I would argue it's built on a misunderstanding of the work.
One of the many criticisms of Gulliver's Travels was that it was not really a novel at all.
The book is deeply episodic and Gulliver, they argue, doesn't really change in the first three sections of the book before suddenly morphing into a mouthpiece for Swift's misanthropy at the end.
I think he does change, for the final book only really makes sense if Gulliver has gone
Rationality is still the subject, but whereas previously Swift views it through the prism of political, academic and scientific institutions,
And this is the book that people really disliked, that brought forth accusations of misanthropy.
So what happens in this fourth part is that Gulliver first meets some creatures he learns are called yahoos.
Secondly, he meets creatures called whinims, who look like horses, but they're civil, thoughtful, clean, and neat.
And this contrast between people like swarms who seem to represent the worst of humanity and horses who seem to have a very pure and stripped down sense of morality and reason is Some readers find some of the expressions of their rationality quite off-putting.
There is a radical detachment from a lot of what we tend to think often makes us human.
It's an accusation that's been made many times since, but I would argue it's built on a misunderstanding of the work.
One of the many criticisms of Gulliver's Travels was that it was not really a novel at all.
The book is deeply episodic and Gulliver, they argue, doesn't really change in the first three sections of the book before suddenly morphing into a mouthpiece for Swift's misanthropy at the end.
I think he does change, for the final book only really makes sense if Gulliver has gone
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.