From Score Drop to Breakthrough
Focused reflection drove her dramatic score improvement
Sep 10, 2026 · 1 hr 21 min · 13 segments
**Spoiler Warning:** This episode discusses questions from the second free Official GMAT Practice Exam on mba.com. If you haven't taken that exam yet, there ***will*** be some spoilers. **What should…
Hailey CusimanoGuestZachHostYeah, definitely.
So three things pop up right away.
One is that she started on a roll.
Like, wow, awesome.
The first seven questions correct.
That's pretty darn cool.
And she had some good pacing here.
And then at the end, what I'm seeing is one question where she spent quite a bit of time on, more than five minutes on one question just to get it wrong.
And then towards the end, she didn't have time to finish two questions, it looks like, which can really ding your score.
So a really strong start and probably a really frustrating finish for her.
A mixed bag in the middle, I'm not quite sure what to make of that.

Yeah, we'll talk more about that in just a moment because we're going to kind of get in, step into her shoes a little bit as we go, not quite question by question, but start to kind of move through this section a little bit and talk about what was happening for her in the moment.

So one really important thing to call out is that, you know, her score dropped numerically.

She scored a 72 in the quant, right? Percentile leaves a little bit to be desired.

In fact, with absolutely zero prep, she actually performed a little bit better in the quantitative section.

And I'm sure, Zach, it'll be no surprise to you, knowing how the ins and outs of the test work, that a lot of that just had to do with some of the decision making she was moving through in the exam.

Now that she knows what she knows and knows what she doesn't know, it's a little more tempting to linger on a question in a way that maybe doesn't necessarily end up paying off in the long run, right? That 5.4.

If we're going to miss a question, I would way rather somebody missed that question 20, 30 seconds in, when they recognize that the additional time investment is no longer gonna stand to add the same amount of value.

Then throw three minutes at the question and then go, man, now I've got this sunken cost bias.

and then run into a situation where we aren't able to tackle questions toward the close.
Yeah, definitely.
So three things pop up right away.
One is that she started on a roll.
Like, wow, awesome.
The first seven questions correct.
That's pretty darn cool.
And she had some good pacing here.
And then at the end, what I'm seeing is one question where she spent quite a bit of time on, more than five minutes on one question just to get it wrong.
And then towards the end, she didn't have time to finish two questions, it looks like, which can really ding your score.
So a really strong start and probably a really frustrating finish for her.
A mixed bag in the middle, I'm not quite sure what to make of that.

Yeah, we'll talk more about that in just a moment because we're going to kind of get in, step into her shoes a little bit as we go, not quite question by question, but start to kind of move through this section a little bit and talk about what was happening for her in the moment.

So one really important thing to call out is that, you know, her score dropped numerically.

She scored a 72 in the quant, right? Percentile leaves a little bit to be desired.

In fact, with absolutely zero prep, she actually performed a little bit better in the quantitative section.

And I'm sure, Zach, it'll be no surprise to you, knowing how the ins and outs of the test work, that a lot of that just had to do with some of the decision making she was moving through in the exam.

Now that she knows what she knows and knows what she doesn't know, it's a little more tempting to linger on a question in a way that maybe doesn't necessarily end up paying off in the long run, right? That 5.4.

If we're going to miss a question, I would way rather somebody missed that question 20, 30 seconds in, when they recognize that the additional time investment is no longer gonna stand to add the same amount of value.

Then throw three minutes at the question and then go, man, now I've got this sunken cost bias.

and then run into a situation where we aren't able to tackle questions toward the close.
Every episode on Radar is fully transcribed, speaker-labeled, and rich with metadata. Here is a taste of this one. Try Radar for free to see the rest.
3 of 8
From Score Drop to Breakthrough
Focused reflection drove her dramatic score improvement
When To Walk Away
Flagging hard questions can restore test momentum
The Clock Creates Panic
One question can derail an entire section
+5 more clips · 8 min 44 sec of audio in all
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
All 8 clips — the highlight moments, each cut as its own audio, with a title and a speaker
All 13 segments — the transcript broken into labeled sections, every ad read marked
All 22 topics — jump to every other episode discussing the same subject
Every related episode — other shows Radar links to this one
No account is needed to search Radar.