Sep 24, 2026 · 1 hr 9 min · 18 segments
"Organisations are operating at a time of unusually intense and overlapping change. But history provides us with an optimistic message about our ability to adapt." This week on the How to Thrive…
Alessandro De ArcangelisGuest
Claire SandersHost
Helen Silver-MacMahonHost
So what I'm kind of hearing through that, and Helen, I'll be interested in your thought, is this kind of like when we think about the way that we make decisions as humans and we do this kind of the pattern matching and we look at what's happened and we're matching patterns in our head.

But then what happens now when we are facing brand new things like AI? Are we searching for things like it in the past? Can we pull on anything that's happened historically to shape how we need to act in the future?
I think this is also another important lesson that we can draw from history in the sense that whenever there's been disruption, whenever there's been fundamental change with regard to how people work, how societies function, and how even politics is imagined and sort of discussed and put in place, What I personally always saw is a lot of resilience and adaptability.
We actually see that no matter what, people will find a way to adapt to change and in some ways to steer change in a way that is ultimately positive and healthy.
You see it, for example, I mean, people are drawing countless parallels between what's happening now with AI and the Industrial Revolution, for example.
And yeah, the Industrial Revolution was not an easy, straightforward and unproblematic process.
I mean, every revolution, you know, to cite Hannah Arendt, comes with what she called a pathos of novelty.
And again, even Koselleck, whom I mentioned earlier, talked about this a lot.
And he mentioned revolutions as a period of crisis in which what actually happens does not conform at all to how you imagine the future would be like.
So I think there are a lot of transformationalist accounts of what's happening in the world of work at the moment and how AI is going to create disruption.
And yes, we can see it all around us that there is a lot of disruption, but I do think that history also provides us with a positive and optimistic message about our ability to adapt.

I was actually at a conference and there was a lady whose name I now can't remember, which is not very helpful.

But she was from Cambridge University and she was talking about the parallels with what we're seeing more widely beyond AI, but in terms of global instability.

So she was saying that for us, it feels like this is all new and it's never happened before and it's unprecedented.

But actually, we can use history as a way of looking back and saying, There was mass disruption in the 17th century and it was consistent in the same way that it feels like we're seeing now.
I think, you know, what's really important to keep in mind is that historical problems, they never sort of repeat in the same way.
There are consistencies, as you said, rightly, some similarities, parallels that we can draw.

So what I'm kind of hearing through that, and Helen, I'll be interested in your thought, is this kind of like when we think about the way that we make decisions as humans and we do this kind of the pattern matching and we look at what's happened and we're matching patterns in our head.

But then what happens now when we are facing brand new things like AI? Are we searching for things like it in the past? Can we pull on anything that's happened historically to shape how we need to act in the future?
I think this is also another important lesson that we can draw from history in the sense that whenever there's been disruption, whenever there's been fundamental change with regard to how people work, how societies function, and how even politics is imagined and sort of discussed and put in place, What I personally always saw is a lot of resilience and adaptability.
We actually see that no matter what, people will find a way to adapt to change and in some ways to steer change in a way that is ultimately positive and healthy.
You see it, for example, I mean, people are drawing countless parallels between what's happening now with AI and the Industrial Revolution, for example.
And yeah, the Industrial Revolution was not an easy, straightforward and unproblematic process.
I mean, every revolution, you know, to cite Hannah Arendt, comes with what she called a pathos of novelty.
And again, even Koselleck, whom I mentioned earlier, talked about this a lot.
And he mentioned revolutions as a period of crisis in which what actually happens does not conform at all to how you imagine the future would be like.
So I think there are a lot of transformationalist accounts of what's happening in the world of work at the moment and how AI is going to create disruption.
And yes, we can see it all around us that there is a lot of disruption, but I do think that history also provides us with a positive and optimistic message about our ability to adapt.

I was actually at a conference and there was a lady whose name I now can't remember, which is not very helpful.

But she was from Cambridge University and she was talking about the parallels with what we're seeing more widely beyond AI, but in terms of global instability.

So she was saying that for us, it feels like this is all new and it's never happened before and it's unprecedented.

But actually, we can use history as a way of looking back and saying, There was mass disruption in the 17th century and it was consistent in the same way that it feels like we're seeing now.
I think, you know, what's really important to keep in mind is that historical problems, they never sort of repeat in the same way.
There are consistencies, as you said, rightly, some similarities, parallels that we can draw.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.