Sep 14, 2026 · 23 min · 9 segments
Starting some time in the last decade or so, we’ve all run into the dreaded phrase “elevated horror.” Sometimes it meant A24. Sometimes it meant horror movies too-obvious in their treatment of grief…
So let's start with the basic question.
What is, or what was, post-horror? As mentioned a minute ago, most people tend to spot post-horror by its content.
A course definition would say post-horror is any horror movie since around two thousand fourteen that led with clear thematic or metaphoric content.
Think of any time in the last decade when you've realized within minutes that the ghost or the monster is a metaphor for grief, or motherhood, or trauma.
That's the kind of horror movie we're talking about.
But David Church offers a more granular and useful definition.
Church points out that metaphors and sociopolitical themes are by no means new to the horror genre.
Instead, Church argues that post-horror movies are best understood according to their formal or stylistic traits.
Rather than thinking about post-horror movies in terms of what they said, Church encourages us to focus on how they're saying it.
Church sums up the basic definition as follows.
Post-horror was a, quote, "Cycle of independently produced and potentially profitable horror films that merge art cinema style with decentered genre tropes, privileging lingering dread and visual restraint over audiovisual shocks and monstrous disgust." Unquote.
Stylistically, Church links post-horror to the modernist cinema of the nineteen fifties through the nineteen seventies.
For Church, post-horror films are defined less by what they say and more how they say it.
In particular, Church identifies the following key characteristics that post-horror films borrowed from modernist cinema.
Quote, "Drifting circular and open-ended narratives, ambiguous and psychologically complex characters, and various forms of spatial and temporal manipulation, including deliberate continuity violations and durational realism." Unquote.
In all these ways, post-horror adopted a radical less is more approach that impressed professional critics while disappointing popular audiences.
As a result, there emerged another key characteristic of the post-horror moment, a yawning divide between critical acclaim and audience appreciation.
As we can see from this chart, critics tended to laud these movies.
Audience reactions as measured by Rotten Tomatoes audience score and CinemaScore were rarely as impressed.
More than anything, critics and audiences were disagreeing on expectations.
Critics, traditionally hostile to horror movies, found themselves pleasantly surprised by this new form of horror.
They recognized and related to the modernist style, which they'd paid a lot of money to learn about in grad school.
Popular audiences, mainly out for a good time at the movies, found themselves met with pretentious bummers that withheld more than they gave.
Horror fans were caught somewhere in the middle, keenly interested in this new wave of successful horror films but irritated by condescending discourse and overheated marketing campaigns.
So let's start with the basic question.
What is, or what was, post-horror? As mentioned a minute ago, most people tend to spot post-horror by its content.
A course definition would say post-horror is any horror movie since around two thousand fourteen that led with clear thematic or metaphoric content.
Think of any time in the last decade when you've realized within minutes that the ghost or the monster is a metaphor for grief, or motherhood, or trauma.
That's the kind of horror movie we're talking about.
But David Church offers a more granular and useful definition.
Church points out that metaphors and sociopolitical themes are by no means new to the horror genre.
Instead, Church argues that post-horror movies are best understood according to their formal or stylistic traits.
Rather than thinking about post-horror movies in terms of what they said, Church encourages us to focus on how they're saying it.
Church sums up the basic definition as follows.
Post-horror was a, quote, "Cycle of independently produced and potentially profitable horror films that merge art cinema style with decentered genre tropes, privileging lingering dread and visual restraint over audiovisual shocks and monstrous disgust." Unquote.
Stylistically, Church links post-horror to the modernist cinema of the nineteen fifties through the nineteen seventies.
For Church, post-horror films are defined less by what they say and more how they say it.
In particular, Church identifies the following key characteristics that post-horror films borrowed from modernist cinema.
Quote, "Drifting circular and open-ended narratives, ambiguous and psychologically complex characters, and various forms of spatial and temporal manipulation, including deliberate continuity violations and durational realism." Unquote.
In all these ways, post-horror adopted a radical less is more approach that impressed professional critics while disappointing popular audiences.
As a result, there emerged another key characteristic of the post-horror moment, a yawning divide between critical acclaim and audience appreciation.
As we can see from this chart, critics tended to laud these movies.
Audience reactions as measured by Rotten Tomatoes audience score and CinemaScore were rarely as impressed.
More than anything, critics and audiences were disagreeing on expectations.
Critics, traditionally hostile to horror movies, found themselves pleasantly surprised by this new form of horror.
They recognized and related to the modernist style, which they'd paid a lot of money to learn about in grad school.
Popular audiences, mainly out for a good time at the movies, found themselves met with pretentious bummers that withheld more than they gave.
Horror fans were caught somewhere in the middle, keenly interested in this new wave of successful horror films but irritated by condescending discourse and overheated marketing campaigns.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.