Jul 10, 2026 · 37 min · 9 segments
Become a Ctrl-Alt-Speech supporter to get extended episodes of the podcast plus the chance to submit stories for us to cover. In this week's episode, Mike…
Mike MasnickHostWe don't necessarily set out to bash meta here on control or speech, but they do kind of bring it on themselves.
And I think that's certainly the case when it comes to ad fraud, which is a story I want to focus on this week.
He did a big investigation and found that around 10% of Meta's revenue for 2024 was based on fraudulent ads or scam ads.
And when you think about how much revenue that consists of, it's a very large advertising machine.
The analysis and the discussion after that was whether Meta was really doing enough to combat ad fraud on the platform.
Was it kind of incentivized to deploy the tools that it used for organic content in the same way for its ad business? And a really interesting interview that came out this week with one of their VPs in EMEA actually adds a bit more context to that.
And then I'll get your thoughts, Mike, on whether ads, trust and safety is still a massive issue for us.
It's with a vice president called Dalia Matras, who's a European-based vice president.
She talks a little bit about the California product design appeal, which we're kind of expecting to happen at some point this year.
First of all, she said, and I quote, it's not like we knowingly have bad ads, which is a phrase I take a lot of umbrage with.
To which my reaction was, well, you're not trying quite hard enough, right? And there is this kind of question as to whether Meta is looking the other way or leaving ads up as part of its revenue goals.
The piece that we'll include in the show notes talks about how just in Q1 of 2026 alone, its revenues grew 33% year-on-year to $56 billion.
So it has spent historically... a half of what it earned in revenue in Q1 alone, just to kind of make the maths clear.
We don't necessarily set out to bash meta here on control or speech, but they do kind of bring it on themselves.
And I think that's certainly the case when it comes to ad fraud, which is a story I want to focus on this week.
He did a big investigation and found that around 10% of Meta's revenue for 2024 was based on fraudulent ads or scam ads.
And when you think about how much revenue that consists of, it's a very large advertising machine.
The analysis and the discussion after that was whether Meta was really doing enough to combat ad fraud on the platform.
Was it kind of incentivized to deploy the tools that it used for organic content in the same way for its ad business? And a really interesting interview that came out this week with one of their VPs in EMEA actually adds a bit more context to that.
And then I'll get your thoughts, Mike, on whether ads, trust and safety is still a massive issue for us.
It's with a vice president called Dalia Matras, who's a European-based vice president.
She talks a little bit about the California product design appeal, which we're kind of expecting to happen at some point this year.
First of all, she said, and I quote, it's not like we knowingly have bad ads, which is a phrase I take a lot of umbrage with.
To which my reaction was, well, you're not trying quite hard enough, right? And there is this kind of question as to whether Meta is looking the other way or leaving ads up as part of its revenue goals.
The piece that we'll include in the show notes talks about how just in Q1 of 2026 alone, its revenues grew 33% year-on-year to $56 billion.
So it has spent historically... a half of what it earned in revenue in Q1 alone, just to kind of make the maths clear.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.