Sep 29, 2026 · 18 min · 5 segments
This week on China Inc., we dive into the notable absence of Chinese corporate leaders during President Xi Jinping’s recent summit in Washington. Why were American CEOs front and center while leaders…
We'll start with Xi's Washington visit, which was the talk of the town in both Washington and Beijing as the leaders of the world's two largest economies met for their second summit this year.
focus on what got said and done or maybe what didn't get said and done, we'll zero in on one thing that was notably absent, which was the absence of any Chinese business delegation with Xi.
So, Renee, everyone's guessing what may have happened is there was plenty of chatter about this delegation in the week before the summit, and then it just never showed up.
Some are saying China took too long to finalize its list of attendees, and others are saying the U.S. didn't want to let the face of Chinese businesses be seen so prominently at such a sensitive time.
know, throw your interpretation into the ring with everybody else? Oh yeah, why not? Go for it.
First of all, I've done a bit of research and basically what I have found out is that typically, historically, business people never really traveled or extremely rarely traveled with Xi Jinping on official state trips.
So this seems to either have been a departure from tradition, if I can call it tradition, or media fantasizing, or companies affabulating and trying to create a debate or a discussion so that it would force the hand of politicians and get them invited.
But I think probably more importantly, If you look at some of the companies that were going to attend or were rumored to potentially join on the trip and so on, it seems more plausible that some of them, that the U.S. government administration objected to some of them being on the trip on account of national security and the product of some of those companies having dual purpose, which is, I guess, diplomatic language to mean that they could be used by the Chinese army, the PLA, or the surveillance apparatus of China and so on.
So that's a second reason, which is probably as plausible as the first one, assuming that What I have read about past practice on official travel around the world seems to be actually what happened as opposed to people running out of time or whatever.
Well, how about that? I mean, the lack of Chinese business leaders was really a sharp contrast to the attendance of all kinds of U.S.
You know, what kind of signal does this send, you know, to the U.S.? Allowing all its top business leaders to come to this event and know if they're the ones who stopped the Chinese, you know, especially after China really seems to be bending over backwards lately to welcome big Western business leaders, both with and without presidential
Companies going on state visits do not create jobs, right? So that's one thing.
We'll start with Xi's Washington visit, which was the talk of the town in both Washington and Beijing as the leaders of the world's two largest economies met for their second summit this year.
focus on what got said and done or maybe what didn't get said and done, we'll zero in on one thing that was notably absent, which was the absence of any Chinese business delegation with Xi.
So, Renee, everyone's guessing what may have happened is there was plenty of chatter about this delegation in the week before the summit, and then it just never showed up.
Some are saying China took too long to finalize its list of attendees, and others are saying the U.S. didn't want to let the face of Chinese businesses be seen so prominently at such a sensitive time.
know, throw your interpretation into the ring with everybody else? Oh yeah, why not? Go for it.
First of all, I've done a bit of research and basically what I have found out is that typically, historically, business people never really traveled or extremely rarely traveled with Xi Jinping on official state trips.
So this seems to either have been a departure from tradition, if I can call it tradition, or media fantasizing, or companies affabulating and trying to create a debate or a discussion so that it would force the hand of politicians and get them invited.
But I think probably more importantly, If you look at some of the companies that were going to attend or were rumored to potentially join on the trip and so on, it seems more plausible that some of them, that the U.S. government administration objected to some of them being on the trip on account of national security and the product of some of those companies having dual purpose, which is, I guess, diplomatic language to mean that they could be used by the Chinese army, the PLA, or the surveillance apparatus of China and so on.
So that's a second reason, which is probably as plausible as the first one, assuming that What I have read about past practice on official travel around the world seems to be actually what happened as opposed to people running out of time or whatever.
Well, how about that? I mean, the lack of Chinese business leaders was really a sharp contrast to the attendance of all kinds of U.S.
You know, what kind of signal does this send, you know, to the U.S.? Allowing all its top business leaders to come to this event and know if they're the ones who stopped the Chinese, you know, especially after China really seems to be bending over backwards lately to welcome big Western business leaders, both with and without presidential
Companies going on state visits do not create jobs, right? So that's one thing.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.