Solving Without Understanding
Are quick answers enough for understanding?
Feb 24, 2026 · 44 min · 23 segments
In this conversation, Ian Stewart discusses the nature of mathematical inquiry, the motivations behind problem-solving in mathematics, and the importance of storytelling in making math relatable. He…
Well, I think problems come, mathematical problems come from the real world, so-called, from the natural world.
In the past, enormous important things have happened because somebody looked at a snowflake and thought, "Why do they look like that?" Or threw a pebble in a pond and watched the ripples.
And sometimes the, the other extreme, mathematical ideas come because some mathematician's sitting there not really thinking about anything very much and suddenly think, "Oh, now, what about, you know, um, you know, I- there, there's a, a whole bunch of ideas I've been thinking about, and I've just noticed there's a kind of gap in the middle of them all.
There's some obvious questions that ought to be asked." And, uh, uh, and then that starts them off.
The idea gets batted to and fro between the real world and the world of the mathematician's imagination.
I mean, uh, over my career I've written more than 200 research papers, often with various people, and these have arisen from almost any kind of inspiration.
It's a chatting over coffee at some point with somebody that you haven't actually met before, or there, there's an obvious problem that everybody knows about and you think it's about time you should do something about this stupid thing that nobody understands.
So the whole history of mathematics is full of problems that knock around for hundreds of years and problems that people think up and solve within the next 10 minutes.
Well, I think problems come, mathematical problems come from the real world, so-called, from the natural world.
In the past, enormous important things have happened because somebody looked at a snowflake and thought, "Why do they look like that?" Or threw a pebble in a pond and watched the ripples.
And sometimes the, the other extreme, mathematical ideas come because some mathematician's sitting there not really thinking about anything very much and suddenly think, "Oh, now, what about, you know, um, you know, I- there, there's a, a whole bunch of ideas I've been thinking about, and I've just noticed there's a kind of gap in the middle of them all.
There's some obvious questions that ought to be asked." And, uh, uh, and then that starts them off.
The idea gets batted to and fro between the real world and the world of the mathematician's imagination.
I mean, uh, over my career I've written more than 200 research papers, often with various people, and these have arisen from almost any kind of inspiration.
It's a chatting over coffee at some point with somebody that you haven't actually met before, or there, there's an obvious problem that everybody knows about and you think it's about time you should do something about this stupid thing that nobody understands.
So the whole history of mathematics is full of problems that knock around for hundreds of years and problems that people think up and solve within the next 10 minutes.
Every episode on Radar is fully transcribed, speaker-labeled, and rich with metadata. Here is a taste of this one. Try Radar for free to see the rest.
3 of 8
Solving Without Understanding
Are quick answers enough for understanding?
Four-Color Proof Culture Shock
When a computer settled a classic dispute
We Wanted A Poem
Why elegance still matters in proofs
+5 more clips · 16 min 33 sec of audio in all
7 of 25
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
All 8 clips — the highlight moments, each cut as its own audio, with a title and a speaker
All 23 segments — the transcript broken into labeled sections, every ad read marked
All 25 topics — jump to every other episode discussing the same subject
Every related episode — other shows Radar links to this one
No account is needed to search Radar.