New NavVis CLX - Everything you need to know

would like to start with a quote from your CTO, because I read it somewhere that with this CLX, you are trying to, to bridge or to close the gap.

So I was just asking myself, like, what gap guys, like, you already have VLX, you have MLX, you are basically claiming that you can do any job with those two.

So what gap are you going to close?

So, yes, we can do a lot of jobs with our previous portfolio with MLAX and VLAX.

But the gap we want to close is that there is, in our opinion, a place for a device that is meant for those low margin shops where MLX or VLX data quality is basically overkill.

And we addressed it already with echo processing, so where we have a more affordable way to process the data.

but also something which is like more accessible for everyday users.

So if you think about the MLX and the VLX, these are really like tools you use for a very specific job.

So whatever it might be, indoors, outdoors.

With another CLX, which by the way, of course also have with me and show you in a second more, it's more that everybody in the team should just be able to grab the CLX and map something out.

And for many of the jobs that many of our customers do, like for example error referencing or simple LOD 200 jobs, scan to BIM, scan to CAD, our devices are just a little bit overkill, so a bit too pricey maybe also.

There are of course more affordable devices.

But I think what the problem in the market is that these more affordable devices don't have the reliability.

And even if you don't need the data quality, you do need the reliability of these devices.

And I think this is the gap that we want to close with ZLX.

It almost feels like you are admitting to being quite expensive on the market.

I mean, it depends who you talk to and what kind of projects you have.

But it's just a reality that you capture is that not every project has, you can't price it in the market, but it's reasonable to use a VLX or MLX for this job.

So if you do, for example, we have customers who do a lot of scanning of apartment blocks.

You scan, I don't know, 50 to 100 square meters per site, so to say, per apartment.

And you do that in five minutes and you go out again.

And it's just like much, much easier to do that with a CLX.

And you don't need the data quality of an MLX or VLX.

No, that's true.

And I was trying to be funny with that expensive remark because I think it was a few months ago when I actually helped you guys with the campaign around the calculator that you released on your website where basically anybody can just calculate and check the costs of scanning with either VLX or MLX compared to TLS scanning, right? Yeah.