everybody.My name is Charles Dowdy with North Shore Media Group, and this is the sixth episode of Who Killed Roxanne? And barring something dramatic in the near future, this will be the last episode for a little while.
Remember what I said about my intentions with this podcast way back in the first episode? I said advocating on Roxanne's behalf now, a 40-plus-year-old cold case, might be a lost cause.
Remember the stats I quoted to you about cold cases and how many of them there are? And we talked about the challenges of solving one.
The stats tell us it would be a tall order to find and convict whoever killed Roxanne Sharp.
In that first episode, I said maybe it was too tall of an order for the stated purpose of this podcast.
So what if the bar was lower? I said, what if all I was trying to accomplish was to get information from people who so far had been unwilling to provide it? That's what I said back in episode one.
And that was good enough for you to keep listening then, and it was good enough for me to keep working on this project week in and week out.
Look, to be honest, I think I quoted those stats and lowered those expectations to protect myself from the fear of failure.
What if I did all this work and no one cared? What if we made this big effort and no one came forward with information? Well, my expectations are a lot higher now than they were when we started, and it's your fault.
And even though I don't know everything that your tips have contained, I do know that valuable information has been brought forward in the last few weeks.
everybody.My name is Charles Dowdy with North Shore Media Group, and this is the sixth episode of Who Killed Roxanne? And barring something dramatic in the near future, this will be the last episode for a little while.
Remember what I said about my intentions with this podcast way back in the first episode? I said advocating on Roxanne's behalf now, a 40-plus-year-old cold case, might be a lost cause.
Remember the stats I quoted to you about cold cases and how many of them there are? And we talked about the challenges of solving one.
The stats tell us it would be a tall order to find and convict whoever killed Roxanne Sharp.
In that first episode, I said maybe it was too tall of an order for the stated purpose of this podcast.
So what if the bar was lower? I said, what if all I was trying to accomplish was to get information from people who so far had been unwilling to provide it? That's what I said back in episode one.
And that was good enough for you to keep listening then, and it was good enough for me to keep working on this project week in and week out.
Look, to be honest, I think I quoted those stats and lowered those expectations to protect myself from the fear of failure.
What if I did all this work and no one cared? What if we made this big effort and no one came forward with information? Well, my expectations are a lot higher now than they were when we started, and it's your fault.
And even though I don't know everything that your tips have contained, I do know that valuable information has been brought forward in the last few weeks.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.