Oct 16, 2026 · 1 hr 3 min · 13 segments
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit…
Kristian JensenGuestDavid RobertsHostIt's a very big deal, very incredible accomplishment, but the target is 70% by 2030.
And the watchdog group, the Independent Climate Council, recently came out and said, basically, "We don't see the path there.
We don't see that the government has a path there." The Concito think tank ran a bunch of sort of probabilistic projections recently and put the percentage of hitting that target at about 1%.
So I guess the first question is just do you think that target is out of reach?

So if you have a frozen policy, we should be super optimistic and super lucky if we get to the 70.

For instance, to cut emissions from, uh, natural gas-powered heat in housing in Denmark and turn that into heat pumps, turn off the gas pipelines to private housing would definitely change something.

If we added some more power to the industry and a little less natural gas, a little less oil, we could do something more in these areas.

But if you just have frozen policy from now to 2030, it's a very slim chance that we'll get there.

Uh, when it's a chance, it's because Denmark are so focused on wind and solar, that all depends on how the weather will be.

Uh, will it be a cold winter, a warm winter? Will it be a windy day or a quiet day? So there is an opportunity, but really not a very big one.
Well, you have this new government that's put together this new coalition that is proposing to raise the target [laughs] for 2035.

Perhaps to clarify, when we're not on target to 2030, it's a target of a 70% reduction since 1990.

And we're now going for a 82 or even higher per, uh, reduction when we get to 2035.
It's a very big deal, very incredible accomplishment, but the target is 70% by 2030.
And the watchdog group, the Independent Climate Council, recently came out and said, basically, "We don't see the path there.
We don't see that the government has a path there." The Concito think tank ran a bunch of sort of probabilistic projections recently and put the percentage of hitting that target at about 1%.
So I guess the first question is just do you think that target is out of reach?

So if you have a frozen policy, we should be super optimistic and super lucky if we get to the 70.

For instance, to cut emissions from, uh, natural gas-powered heat in housing in Denmark and turn that into heat pumps, turn off the gas pipelines to private housing would definitely change something.

If we added some more power to the industry and a little less natural gas, a little less oil, we could do something more in these areas.

But if you just have frozen policy from now to 2030, it's a very slim chance that we'll get there.

Uh, when it's a chance, it's because Denmark are so focused on wind and solar, that all depends on how the weather will be.

Uh, will it be a cold winter, a warm winter? Will it be a windy day or a quiet day? So there is an opportunity, but really not a very big one.
Well, you have this new government that's put together this new coalition that is proposing to raise the target [laughs] for 2035.

Perhaps to clarify, when we're not on target to 2030, it's a target of a 70% reduction since 1990.

And we're now going for a 82 or even higher per, uh, reduction when we get to 2035.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.