Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast
Aug 17, 2026 · 11 min · 7 segments
In this episode of *Unpacking the Case*, we examine the Upper Tribunal's decision in ***Notting Hill Home Ownership Ltd v Samoail and Others* \[2026] UKUT 235 (LC)**, a significant ruling for…
Richard SnapeHostLizzieHostHello, and welcome to a newsflash episode of Unpacking the Case, the podcast by Davitt Jones Bold, the real estate law specialists.
As always, I'm joined by our head of legal training, Richard Snape.
[upbeat music] Welcome to Unpacking the Case, the property law podcast by Davitt Jones Bold.
This week, we're looking at a case that will be of particular interest to landlords, housing associations, and anyone involved in shared ownership developments.
In Notting Hill Home Ownership Limited and Samuel and others, the Upper Tribunal was asked whether shared ownership leaseholders could be charged for the upkeep of facilities that their leases didn't cover and that they couldn't actually access.
The tribunal's answer was clear.
If the lease doesn't give residents rights over those facilities, landlords cannot simply pass on the cost of maintaining them through service charges.
So what does this mean for service charge recovery, lease drafting, and estate management going forward? Let's unpack the case.
Read the full transcript.
Create an account to read the whole episode, search across every transcript, and follow the shows you care about.
Hello, and welcome to a newsflash episode of Unpacking the Case, the podcast by Davitt Jones Bold, the real estate law specialists.
As always, I'm joined by our head of legal training, Richard Snape.
[upbeat music] Welcome to Unpacking the Case, the property law podcast by Davitt Jones Bold.
This week, we're looking at a case that will be of particular interest to landlords, housing associations, and anyone involved in shared ownership developments.
In Notting Hill Home Ownership Limited and Samuel and others, the Upper Tribunal was asked whether shared ownership leaseholders could be charged for the upkeep of facilities that their leases didn't cover and that they couldn't actually access.
The tribunal's answer was clear.
If the lease doesn't give residents rights over those facilities, landlords cannot simply pass on the cost of maintaining them through service charges.
So what does this mean for service charge recovery, lease drafting, and estate management going forward? Let's unpack the case.