Oct 27, 2026 · 59 min · 10 segments
**If a Washington, D.C., think tank publishes a voluminous policy paper, but barely anyone reads it, does it have an impact? Not really, according to Todd Moss, long-time development think tank leader…
Todd MossGuest
Michael IgoeHost
I was working at the Center for Global Development, and I found myself in the State Department.

And, you know, when we were at CGD, this was in the early 2000s, all the rage were cross-country growth regressions.

And everybody was working on these statistical studies and doing these regression tables.

And then through a total accident, I wound up being a senior official at the State Department.

And it would actually be almost like ridiculous to put a regression table in front of a senior official.

So when I reflected on that when I left, you have to present information to officials in ways that they can absorb it and that is tied exactly to their existing priorities.

And that means that the tactics really have to start starting with the problem identification.

What problem are you going to try to solve? That has to start with a give and take with the people on the inside, or else you're completely wasting your time.

And if you solve it and then you try to present it in a way like a 270 page report that they will never read, you're not actually helping them solve that problem either.

So, you know, I very much built like the Energy for Growth Hub model on building relationships inside government.

So there could be a 270-page report behind it, but you need to get that cover memo right first.

And why don't more other think tanks do that? I think people just get in the mode...

I was working at the Center for Global Development, and I found myself in the State Department.

And, you know, when we were at CGD, this was in the early 2000s, all the rage were cross-country growth regressions.

And everybody was working on these statistical studies and doing these regression tables.

And then through a total accident, I wound up being a senior official at the State Department.

And it would actually be almost like ridiculous to put a regression table in front of a senior official.

So when I reflected on that when I left, you have to present information to officials in ways that they can absorb it and that is tied exactly to their existing priorities.

And that means that the tactics really have to start starting with the problem identification.

What problem are you going to try to solve? That has to start with a give and take with the people on the inside, or else you're completely wasting your time.

And if you solve it and then you try to present it in a way like a 270 page report that they will never read, you're not actually helping them solve that problem either.

So, you know, I very much built like the Energy for Growth Hub model on building relationships inside government.

So there could be a 270-page report behind it, but you need to get that cover memo right first.

And why don't more other think tanks do that? I think people just get in the mode...
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.