The Report Card with Nat Malkus
Jul 15, 2026 · 1 hr 23 min · 14 segments
During the pandemic, national chronic absenteeism rates surged across all demographics, but what has happened to chronic absenteeism rates since then? Are chronic absenteeism rates back to…
Nat MalkusGuest
Elli LucasHost
So at the risk of boring listeners who keep up with your work, a basic question to start with, what is chronic absenteeism?

Chronic absenteeism is the percentage of K-12 students who miss more, 10% or more of the school year.

So when some people first hear the term chronic absenteeism, they imagine students missing days of school right and left.

When they then hear that chronic absenteeism simply refers to students who miss 10 percent or more of school days, they may think, oh, that's actually that actually doesn't sound too terrible.

And when you get to 10% of the school year, you might want to compare this to a job, right? If you miss 10% of the days that you are working, you are likely to be in trouble with your boss.

I think in the same way, if you miss a day every two weeks at a regular pace, it's going to knock you off of a continuous learning trajectory.

There's a bunch of things that are negatives, net negatives that are associated with chronic absenteeism.

So in some studies, it's one of the greatest predictors of not completing high school.

It's negatively associated with academic achievements and other indicators of engagement in school.

And, you know, the other thing to just point out here is that it's a threshold, right? You cross 10 percent, all of a sudden you're chronically absent.

So it's always important, and I can't end this question without saying that chronic absence is a marker of a number of absences, and a few absences are fine, but each one actually matters.

So I think when many people hear like 10 percent, like one day every two weeks may sound like a lot.

If you miss that continuously, I think everyone would agree that that's like a huge chunk.

So you said in your response that there's nothing magical about that 10 percent threshold.

Is the relationship between absences and the negative consequences of absences continuous? Does it suddenly take off around that 10 percent threshold?

So at the risk of boring listeners who keep up with your work, a basic question to start with, what is chronic absenteeism?

Chronic absenteeism is the percentage of K-12 students who miss more, 10% or more of the school year.

So when some people first hear the term chronic absenteeism, they imagine students missing days of school right and left.

When they then hear that chronic absenteeism simply refers to students who miss 10 percent or more of school days, they may think, oh, that's actually that actually doesn't sound too terrible.

And when you get to 10% of the school year, you might want to compare this to a job, right? If you miss 10% of the days that you are working, you are likely to be in trouble with your boss.

I think in the same way, if you miss a day every two weeks at a regular pace, it's going to knock you off of a continuous learning trajectory.

There's a bunch of things that are negatives, net negatives that are associated with chronic absenteeism.

So in some studies, it's one of the greatest predictors of not completing high school.

It's negatively associated with academic achievements and other indicators of engagement in school.

And, you know, the other thing to just point out here is that it's a threshold, right? You cross 10 percent, all of a sudden you're chronically absent.

So it's always important, and I can't end this question without saying that chronic absence is a marker of a number of absences, and a few absences are fine, but each one actually matters.

So I think when many people hear like 10 percent, like one day every two weeks may sound like a lot.

If you miss that continuously, I think everyone would agree that that's like a huge chunk.

So you said in your response that there's nothing magical about that 10 percent threshold.

Is the relationship between absences and the negative consequences of absences continuous? Does it suddenly take off around that 10 percent threshold?
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.