Sep 3, 2026 · 38 min · 18 segments
In this episode of The Purposeful Strategist, Belden Menkus speaks with Mark Tapscott, Co-Founder and CEO of Longbow, an electric sports car company whose aim is to engineer cars that are fast…
Belden MenkusHost
We talked a bit before, and in that conversation, you've talked about a future plan to break and rebuild the company.
What do you mean by that? Why is that the way to go at it? Back like that, that sounds foolish, scary, or a number of other things, but I promise you it's a really sensible approach.
Perhaps I think as a team, we've launched probably more electric car companies than perhaps anybody else.
And what it meant was that there were quite a few companies that would maybe show a pretty picture of a car or a product, say they were going to build it, get billions of dollars of investment in and build the company out and then only plan on having a product out in many years to come.
So what you ended up having was this huge organization that you'd spent billions of dollars building, but it wasn't the right size for the company at the time.
Also, you end up bringing in different types of characters, different types of people into the business when it's scaling at that rate.
And so for us, when we talk about making and breaking the company, we're taking a strategic approach, we think, which is that you develop one vehicle first.
And the company you need to build that product is very, very different to the company that you need to build product behind me um a much higher volume vehicle so instead of trying to build a company for that higher volume vehicle and causing a whole lot of problems and costing a huge amount of money certainly some excess would be spent within that we actually build the company for what's needed to now learn a whole lot have that team that core team that can do that then break it all apart and those that want to continue and those systems that should continue will do so otherwise you know we really should build it for that next stage of company yeah And I very much believe that's going to happen at least twice throughout our history.

So if I've got to write 150, what's sort of the next kind of even indicative size range of the volume for the next iteration and then the one beyond that?
It's a good question because what you're probably talking about there is this sort of valley of death.

We talked a bit before, and in that conversation, you've talked about a future plan to break and rebuild the company.
What do you mean by that? Why is that the way to go at it? Back like that, that sounds foolish, scary, or a number of other things, but I promise you it's a really sensible approach.
Perhaps I think as a team, we've launched probably more electric car companies than perhaps anybody else.
And what it meant was that there were quite a few companies that would maybe show a pretty picture of a car or a product, say they were going to build it, get billions of dollars of investment in and build the company out and then only plan on having a product out in many years to come.
So what you ended up having was this huge organization that you'd spent billions of dollars building, but it wasn't the right size for the company at the time.
Also, you end up bringing in different types of characters, different types of people into the business when it's scaling at that rate.
And so for us, when we talk about making and breaking the company, we're taking a strategic approach, we think, which is that you develop one vehicle first.
And the company you need to build that product is very, very different to the company that you need to build product behind me um a much higher volume vehicle so instead of trying to build a company for that higher volume vehicle and causing a whole lot of problems and costing a huge amount of money certainly some excess would be spent within that we actually build the company for what's needed to now learn a whole lot have that team that core team that can do that then break it all apart and those that want to continue and those systems that should continue will do so otherwise you know we really should build it for that next stage of company yeah And I very much believe that's going to happen at least twice throughout our history.

So if I've got to write 150, what's sort of the next kind of even indicative size range of the volume for the next iteration and then the one beyond that?
It's a good question because what you're probably talking about there is this sort of valley of death.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.