The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens
Apr 17, 2026 · 32 min · 18 segments
In this week's Frankly, Nate opens a new series called How to Think About the Future. He begins with some comments he's heard repeatedly on this platform: why cover nuclear, plastics, renewables, or…
Nate HagensHost
I read these comments, though my staff tells me not to, um, and I take most of them seriously because that's how I roll, uh, for better or worse.

And each of these assertions comes from someone who is likely settled on a particular flavor of the future and is framing most everything else against it.

If you've decided that economic collapse is imminent, then conversations about long-term ecological restoration feel, um, like a luxury.

If you decided AI is gonna change everything, then conversations about soil biology feel sort of Amish or, or quaint.

If you've decided that global heating is some socialist hoax, then climate fo-focused episodes or global cooling things feel like a waste of your time, or worse, a loss of credibility, uh, for this platform.

Not only do I understand this impulse, I also notice this tendency in myself, though less so, uh, now.

It used to madden me, but now I get it because there is an efficiency to the human animal to have a single storyline in our heads.

It tells us, as biological organisms with finite lifespans, what to pay attention to and what to ignore.

And in doing so, it saves our cognitive effort and lets us sort out the world quickly to get about our day.

I read these comments, though my staff tells me not to, um, and I take most of them seriously because that's how I roll, uh, for better or worse.

And each of these assertions comes from someone who is likely settled on a particular flavor of the future and is framing most everything else against it.

If you've decided that economic collapse is imminent, then conversations about long-term ecological restoration feel, um, like a luxury.

If you decided AI is gonna change everything, then conversations about soil biology feel sort of Amish or, or quaint.

If you've decided that global heating is some socialist hoax, then climate fo-focused episodes or global cooling things feel like a waste of your time, or worse, a loss of credibility, uh, for this platform.

Not only do I understand this impulse, I also notice this tendency in myself, though less so, uh, now.

It used to madden me, but now I get it because there is an efficiency to the human animal to have a single storyline in our heads.

It tells us, as biological organisms with finite lifespans, what to pay attention to and what to ignore.

And in doing so, it saves our cognitive effort and lets us sort out the world quickly to get about our day.
Every episode on Radar is fully transcribed, speaker-labeled, and rich with metadata. Here is a taste of this one. Try Radar for free to see the rest.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
All 18 segments — the transcript broken into labeled sections, every ad read marked
All 25 topics — jump to every other episode discussing the same subject
Every related episode — other shows Radar links to this one
No account is needed to search Radar.