Sep 18, 2026 · 41 min · 15 segments
On this special release of a pre-recorded September 1st episode with Don Lemon and host J. Carter of the Black Lawyers Podcast we discuss our pro bono legal directory for Content Creators who have…
Jay CarterHost
Don LemonGuest
Jeanetta BrantleyGuest
So are you going to talk to us about this and about Al Sharpton? Is that what you're going to do? So take us to law school, all right? Yes.
So Janetta hasn't specifically said that any of the voices or any of the names that appear to be on the audio have done anything, right? She hasn't made that statement.
And I don't think Al Sharpton has accused anyone, again, of No one's technically accused anybody of anything, but the law of defamation by implication is if you kind of infer, strongly infer that.
that you implied that something could be factual under under Mississippi, at least under Mississippi state law.
But under that law, it says that if you could, if you're strongly implying that something could be factual, then someone could have a case against you for defamation by implication.
So this is the theory that if anyone were to try to come after folks like Jeanette or Al or anyone that's kind of putting one plus one together, they're going to say, well, you're not directly saying it, but you're indirectly stating it.
So it's almost like it's not enough for you to be like, oh, this is just my opinion.
But they're saying, yeah, if you strongly imply that something could be factual, so in this case, could Bart have been responsible because he was there? I mean, by his own admission from his own attorney, he assisted the sea-tail boat, which by the way, actually helps my client because it shows that she wasn't editing Bart's name in the audio.
It actually shows that there's a reason why at least it appears you hear Bart's name because he was nearby and he was talking with the boat.
you're an attorney, let's use your expertise.
I'm so glad you're here.
So because I honestly am not one.
So I know that obviously a lot can be uncovered through the discovery process.
Just for clarification, I couldn't hear all of what you said, attorney, because there was something else in my ear.
So are you going to talk to us about this and about Al Sharpton? Is that what you're going to do? So take us to law school, all right? Yes.
So Janetta hasn't specifically said that any of the voices or any of the names that appear to be on the audio have done anything, right? She hasn't made that statement.
And I don't think Al Sharpton has accused anyone, again, of No one's technically accused anybody of anything, but the law of defamation by implication is if you kind of infer, strongly infer that.
that you implied that something could be factual under under Mississippi, at least under Mississippi state law.
But under that law, it says that if you could, if you're strongly implying that something could be factual, then someone could have a case against you for defamation by implication.
So this is the theory that if anyone were to try to come after folks like Jeanette or Al or anyone that's kind of putting one plus one together, they're going to say, well, you're not directly saying it, but you're indirectly stating it.
So it's almost like it's not enough for you to be like, oh, this is just my opinion.
But they're saying, yeah, if you strongly imply that something could be factual, so in this case, could Bart have been responsible because he was there? I mean, by his own admission from his own attorney, he assisted the sea-tail boat, which by the way, actually helps my client because it shows that she wasn't editing Bart's name in the audio.
It actually shows that there's a reason why at least it appears you hear Bart's name because he was nearby and he was talking with the boat.
you're an attorney, let's use your expertise.
I'm so glad you're here.
So because I honestly am not one.
So I know that obviously a lot can be uncovered through the discovery process.
Just for clarification, I couldn't hear all of what you said, attorney, because there was something else in my ear.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.