The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community
Aug 31, 2026 · 41 min · 11 segments
**How do you prove discrimination when there is no direct evidence? And when does the burden of proof shift to the employer?** **In this episode of The BDBF Podcast**, employment lawyers **Rose Lim**…
Clare BreretonHost
Rose LimHost
And what that means is that somebody has to prove their case to the decision maker, so either to the judge or to the jury, depending on what kind of forum we are in.

And now just to note, the burden of proof is different to the standard of proof.

So the standard of proof is the extent to which the person with the burden must prove their case.

So I think as we would all know, in criminal cases, that is beyond reasonable doubt.

Whereas in civil cases, such as employment tribunal litigation, it is on the balance of probabilities.

Now, what that means is that it is greater than 50% or more likely to have happened than not to have happened.

And the burden of proof is the concept that we use to talk about who has the responsibility for proving their case.

For example, in unfair dismissal claims, the burden is on the employer to prove that the dismissal was fair, i.e. that they had one of the potentially fair reasons and that they followed a fair process.

For whistleblowers, the burden is on the claimant to show that they made the protected disclosures.

And in discrimination cases, just to make things a little bit more complicated for individuals and more interesting for lawyers, the burden starts with the claimant to make out a prima facie case of discrimination before passing to the respondent.

And what that means is that somebody has to prove their case to the decision maker, so either to the judge or to the jury, depending on what kind of forum we are in.

And now just to note, the burden of proof is different to the standard of proof.

So the standard of proof is the extent to which the person with the burden must prove their case.

So I think as we would all know, in criminal cases, that is beyond reasonable doubt.

Whereas in civil cases, such as employment tribunal litigation, it is on the balance of probabilities.

Now, what that means is that it is greater than 50% or more likely to have happened than not to have happened.

And the burden of proof is the concept that we use to talk about who has the responsibility for proving their case.

For example, in unfair dismissal claims, the burden is on the employer to prove that the dismissal was fair, i.e. that they had one of the potentially fair reasons and that they followed a fair process.

For whistleblowers, the burden is on the claimant to show that they made the protected disclosures.

And in discrimination cases, just to make things a little bit more complicated for individuals and more interesting for lawyers, the burden starts with the claimant to make out a prima facie case of discrimination before passing to the respondent.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.