Sep 22, 2026 · 43 min · 11 segments
Eight hundred hospitals, nursing homes, maternal wards, and psychiatric centers have already closed, cut services, or landed at risk. Not projected. Already happened. Three stories this week, and…
Jeremy SadlierPanelist
Luke CarignanHost
Bo BraboHost
There is a new study done in the New England Journal that just said AI will grow the clinical workforce, not shrink it.

So the New England Journal of Medicine, an article titled Artificial Intelligence and the Future of the Clinical Workforce.

Dr. Dhruv Kullar of Weill Cornell Medicine and doctor, I'm so sorry if I just botched your name, was published on September 12th.


A physician and health policy researcher at Weill Cornell just published the counterargument in the New England Journal of Medicine.

So Dr. Dhruv Kular argues that AI agents are more likely to expand the clinical workforce than shrink it.

His case rests on three ideas, all right? One is, and I'm going to, this is just going to be botchville, the Jevons, Jevons paradox.

So what that is, is it's when, it's an idea that when technology makes something cheaper, people use more of it, not less.

And then the last one is the O-ring theory, which is one critical failure at any stage compromises the whole, meaning human oversight stays indispensable at the moments that matter most.

His conclusion is, If AI lowers the cost of care delivery, it will reach more patients, treat more conditions, and require more clinicians, not fewer.

Boys, are we getting schooled on a very high level of common sense here with three points that I've never heard of in my life? I don't

There is a new study done in the New England Journal that just said AI will grow the clinical workforce, not shrink it.

So the New England Journal of Medicine, an article titled Artificial Intelligence and the Future of the Clinical Workforce.

Dr. Dhruv Kullar of Weill Cornell Medicine and doctor, I'm so sorry if I just botched your name, was published on September 12th.


A physician and health policy researcher at Weill Cornell just published the counterargument in the New England Journal of Medicine.

So Dr. Dhruv Kular argues that AI agents are more likely to expand the clinical workforce than shrink it.

His case rests on three ideas, all right? One is, and I'm going to, this is just going to be botchville, the Jevons, Jevons paradox.

So what that is, is it's when, it's an idea that when technology makes something cheaper, people use more of it, not less.

And then the last one is the O-ring theory, which is one critical failure at any stage compromises the whole, meaning human oversight stays indispensable at the moments that matter most.

His conclusion is, If AI lowers the cost of care delivery, it will reach more patients, treat more conditions, and require more clinicians, not fewer.

Boys, are we getting schooled on a very high level of common sense here with three points that I've never heard of in my life? I don't
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.