Tanya 153 – Igeres HaKodesh 12

What's the difference between Meisat Stokkeh and Averizat Stokkeh? Well, This is a long-standing kind of, I don't know, argument, but different shitas and how to, when you have a repetition like this in Tanakh, that sometimes will say, you know, and Ma'albim says never, and that's the general accepted, it has a clear difference in meaning.

... ... ...

So Chazal says, So it says, So it says, So obviously we're not talking about fire, we're not talking about water.

That's obvious.

So what are we talking about? Because the teva of water is that it goes downhill.

It means it's a flow from the one who has to the one that doesn't have.

Chesed in its big picture goes from the superior to the inferior, and it's initiated by the one on top, and it goes to the bottom.

That's chesed.

It represents the flow of chius from the higher worlds to the lower worlds.

That's mayim.

ובחינש איש שטיבוללס למילה It's the other way around.

Fire, if you see it, it sort of keeps going upwards.

And then he speaks about it before Nilo Prokim.

He quotes a Zod that it's like it's the Mokka is the Milo.

But fire looks like it's always A, jumping upwards.

And it is getting narrower as it goes upwards.

It sort of seems to come to a point.

So, in other words, there are two midas in connecting with HaKadosh Baruch Hu.

One is and that's And then there's melemata lemala, which means the person needs to keep refining and being mitzvah himself.

So if a person wants more ruchnias, there's two ways it happens.

One is that Kaddish Baruch Hu infuses more ruchnias in this world.

Or, the person is mit samtzim, and magbil, his physicality, and reaches upwards.

So, in the very Shirish, the difference between chesed and din is, that's the difference.

One is chesed, It's initiated in the malo.

It's not but just as more ruchni is provided.