Oct 13, 2026 · 9 min · 6 segments
Day 37 | Shekalim Today's learning is sponsored by Roger in Seattle in memory of his beloved wife Jane. Tractate Shekalim asks what it means to bind ourselves to something larger than ourselves…
David BashevkinHost
I want to introduce a word in that back and forth, which is the term that is used to describe dialogue in the Talmud.

So there's the following back and forth that appears in the first chapter in the Talmud on the fourth mishna.

In the Jerusalem Talmud, it's not paginated in the same way as the Babylonian Talmud, so the way that we cite it is one colon four.

The Talmud says that everybody had to give the half shekel for communal sacrifices, and there was a question that arose.


They said, "It's a problem if we have to contribute to this." Why? They reasoned as follows, and this is directly from the Talmud Yerushalmi Shekalim.

The Kohanim interpreted the following rule for themselves, and they said, "If we end up donating a half shekel, it's going to be a problem for all the communal sacrifices." Why? Because when a Kohen offers a mincha offering, specifically when a Kohen offers, it gets entirely burnt on the mizbeach, on the altar.

And the Kohanim said that's a rule that applies to any time a Kohen brings this kind of offering.

So if we end up donating and taking part in this, the problem is it's gonna have to be burnt entirely because it's gonna be accepting money and ownership also from Kohanim, and yet we're not following the rules of when a Kohen offers a sacrifice, this specific kind of mincha, that is entirely burnt.

You absolutely need to give, and if a Kohen does not give and contribute the half shekel, they are sinners." What is this back and forth? What is this-- Let's use the Talmudic term.

I want to introduce a word in that back and forth, which is the term that is used to describe dialogue in the Talmud.

So there's the following back and forth that appears in the first chapter in the Talmud on the fourth mishna.

In the Jerusalem Talmud, it's not paginated in the same way as the Babylonian Talmud, so the way that we cite it is one colon four.

The Talmud says that everybody had to give the half shekel for communal sacrifices, and there was a question that arose.


They said, "It's a problem if we have to contribute to this." Why? They reasoned as follows, and this is directly from the Talmud Yerushalmi Shekalim.

The Kohanim interpreted the following rule for themselves, and they said, "If we end up donating a half shekel, it's going to be a problem for all the communal sacrifices." Why? Because when a Kohen offers a mincha offering, specifically when a Kohen offers, it gets entirely burnt on the mizbeach, on the altar.

And the Kohanim said that's a rule that applies to any time a Kohen brings this kind of offering.

So if we end up donating and taking part in this, the problem is it's gonna have to be burnt entirely because it's gonna be accepting money and ownership also from Kohanim, and yet we're not following the rules of when a Kohen offers a sacrifice, this specific kind of mincha, that is entirely burnt.

You absolutely need to give, and if a Kohen does not give and contribute the half shekel, they are sinners." What is this back and forth? What is this-- Let's use the Talmudic term.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.