When we feel that sense of discomfort when reading the Bible, I find it sometimes helpful not to run away from it, but instead to lean into it a bit.
So we're going to be looking at the passage under three headings this morning.
And the first one's mainly thinking about the discomfort.
The first one is the idea of judgment.
It's worth asking why this whole passage around the Passover and the death of the firstborn feels uncomfortable to us.
After all, lots of people in history, maybe even a majority of people in history, would see this as cause for celebration.
Wouldn't have a problem with it.
I think it feels uncomfortable because it jars with the picture we often have of God as gracious and compassionate, slow to anger and abounding in love.
And here he seems to kill an awful lot of people.
Sometimes people try solving that problem by imagining a gap between God in the Old Testament and God in the New Testament and what we see with Jesus.
God famously saying he doesn't desire the death of the wicked, but rather that they might turn from their wickedness and live.
But I think our instinct that there's something off here is right.
meaning he sees it doesn't really fit with his character.
And by chapter 11, he gets to the point where he says, although they richly deserve it, he can't bring himself to finish them off.
Instead, he will restore them and purify them and bring them back to him.
So we need to look at it in a bit more detail.
An interesting angle to take on it, which may or may not float your boat, is there's a whole lot of theory out there about just war and whether violence is ever right.
When we feel that sense of discomfort when reading the Bible, I find it sometimes helpful not to run away from it, but instead to lean into it a bit.
So we're going to be looking at the passage under three headings this morning.
And the first one's mainly thinking about the discomfort.
The first one is the idea of judgment.
It's worth asking why this whole passage around the Passover and the death of the firstborn feels uncomfortable to us.
After all, lots of people in history, maybe even a majority of people in history, would see this as cause for celebration.
Wouldn't have a problem with it.
I think it feels uncomfortable because it jars with the picture we often have of God as gracious and compassionate, slow to anger and abounding in love.
And here he seems to kill an awful lot of people.
Sometimes people try solving that problem by imagining a gap between God in the Old Testament and God in the New Testament and what we see with Jesus.
God famously saying he doesn't desire the death of the wicked, but rather that they might turn from their wickedness and live.
But I think our instinct that there's something off here is right.
meaning he sees it doesn't really fit with his character.
And by chapter 11, he gets to the point where he says, although they richly deserve it, he can't bring himself to finish them off.
Instead, he will restore them and purify them and bring them back to him.
So we need to look at it in a bit more detail.
An interesting angle to take on it, which may or may not float your boat, is there's a whole lot of theory out there about just war and whether violence is ever right.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.