Sep 24, 2026 · 52 min · 10 segments
Jill Thomas speaks with Cornel Calinescu, chair of the Council of Europe committee that negotiated the new Additional Protocol to the Warsaw Convention. They discuss who writes asset recovery…
Cornel CalinescuGuest
Gill ThomasHost
And, and we're really keen to hear about your experience over the last two years with this new international instrument, the, the latest instrument to be developed with the Council of Europe additional protocol.

But before we come onto that, just give us a bit of a flavor of what the world looked like when you took up your position in 2011 as head of the ARO.

'Cause when, when I started in this business back in 2003, I mean, there was really very little infrastructure around then in, in terms of international asset recovery, asset tracing.

But what did asset recovery look like when you started as head of the ARO in 2011?

Well, it was an unknown topic at national level, and internationally there were very few sources of inspiration and of information for, for ourselves.

Recently, we just marked 20 years of existence of CARIN, and we also marked 20 years of, of, uh, international legal standards in asset recovery.

But standards that were dealing with main issues like seizing, confiscation, and mutual legal assistance, and that's what's all available for us.

So we had indeed this source of inspiration from, from partners and colleagues which were members of, of, uh, CARIN network and EU ARO platform at that time.

So for asset recovery offices, this was the only available resource and the only available guidance that we had access to.

Actually, we only managed to regulate asset recovery in the shape that is now known just a few years ago.

Asset recovery offices were just a recommendation and actually a, a result of joining forces among practitioners.

So it was more best practice aggregated by, by, by practitioners that established the, the CARIN network, and then this peer exchange and, and review that we have consolidated in, in the network that allowed us to learn from the ones that were doing it for a longer time.

But again, resources were, were very, very limited, and in comparison with what we have today, it's a huge, huge improvement because now you have at your fingertips libraries with legislation, with best practices, with catalogs, with checklists, with procedures, with everything.

So when I started, it was just a matter of being able to learn from the ones that were doing it ahead of you.

A very, uh, limited standardization, and I think we, we came a long way from those 15 years.

And, uh, again, the, the current practitioners or the current colleagues that are starting just now, they're in a very, very different position than we were.

Again, no standards, no regulations, just best practices and this access to sharing best practices.

They helped us to exchange data and information and also to exchange best practices.

You have provisions finally, you have legal standards, and this is, uh, extremely important because actually we learn in time that without proper legal framework, safeguards, warranties, the results are not coming.

So we needed this regulatory reform to happen, and I'm, I'm delighted AROs and, uh, now AMOs are also heard by policymakers.

And, and we're really keen to hear about your experience over the last two years with this new international instrument, the, the latest instrument to be developed with the Council of Europe additional protocol.

But before we come onto that, just give us a bit of a flavor of what the world looked like when you took up your position in 2011 as head of the ARO.

'Cause when, when I started in this business back in 2003, I mean, there was really very little infrastructure around then in, in terms of international asset recovery, asset tracing.

But what did asset recovery look like when you started as head of the ARO in 2011?

Well, it was an unknown topic at national level, and internationally there were very few sources of inspiration and of information for, for ourselves.

Recently, we just marked 20 years of existence of CARIN, and we also marked 20 years of, of, uh, international legal standards in asset recovery.

But standards that were dealing with main issues like seizing, confiscation, and mutual legal assistance, and that's what's all available for us.

So we had indeed this source of inspiration from, from partners and colleagues which were members of, of, uh, CARIN network and EU ARO platform at that time.

So for asset recovery offices, this was the only available resource and the only available guidance that we had access to.

Actually, we only managed to regulate asset recovery in the shape that is now known just a few years ago.

Asset recovery offices were just a recommendation and actually a, a result of joining forces among practitioners.

So it was more best practice aggregated by, by, by practitioners that established the, the CARIN network, and then this peer exchange and, and review that we have consolidated in, in the network that allowed us to learn from the ones that were doing it for a longer time.

But again, resources were, were very, very limited, and in comparison with what we have today, it's a huge, huge improvement because now you have at your fingertips libraries with legislation, with best practices, with catalogs, with checklists, with procedures, with everything.

So when I started, it was just a matter of being able to learn from the ones that were doing it ahead of you.

A very, uh, limited standardization, and I think we, we came a long way from those 15 years.

And, uh, again, the, the current practitioners or the current colleagues that are starting just now, they're in a very, very different position than we were.

Again, no standards, no regulations, just best practices and this access to sharing best practices.

They helped us to exchange data and information and also to exchange best practices.

You have provisions finally, you have legal standards, and this is, uh, extremely important because actually we learn in time that without proper legal framework, safeguards, warranties, the results are not coming.

So we needed this regulatory reform to happen, and I'm, I'm delighted AROs and, uh, now AMOs are also heard by policymakers.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.