RegWatch by RegulatorWatch.com
Sep 10, 2026 · 33 min · 10 segments
For nearly a decade, the U.S. vaping community has called the FDA’s campaign against nicotine vapes a war on vaping. Beginning with the deeming rule, the agency’s aggressive action against Juul, the…
Raymond MarchGuest
Brent StaffordHost
Does the FDA really have any oversight? Like, or are they too big to fail kind of thing?

they're enormous but they failed so both at least in many regards no it has its hand of regulating 20 of products it's very politically malleable right some of the things we've just seen with the overturning of martin mccary bringing in new administrators of its relationship to the cdc to the broader umbrella agency of the hhs right under rfk jr it's enormous and it's powerful but That doesn't mean it's good.

It doesn't mean it does a particularly great job of regulating goods, of finding the appropriate costs and benefits.

The overwhelming, and I'd have to say 90, 95% of my research finds that when it's correct, it's behind the ball.

And when it's not correct, it can take another half a decade for people to really realize that.

So I don't want to, I'm hesitant to say the FDA is broken, right? The FDA is powerful.

I just recently, before coming on the show, I read an article saying that public trust for the FDA is about 50%.

So my confidence is lower, but public view of that tends to be a little bit higher.

But to say that half the people don't trust the Food and Drug Administration to bring safe and effective goods to market, That's one thing, but it's still incredibly powerful.

But the main reason I think that the FDA makes all of these mistakes continuously, and some of the ones we'll talk about, I'm sure, as we continue, is that there's no way to aggregate any of these things.

Does the FDA really have any oversight? Like, or are they too big to fail kind of thing?

they're enormous but they failed so both at least in many regards no it has its hand of regulating 20 of products it's very politically malleable right some of the things we've just seen with the overturning of martin mccary bringing in new administrators of its relationship to the cdc to the broader umbrella agency of the hhs right under rfk jr it's enormous and it's powerful but That doesn't mean it's good.

It doesn't mean it does a particularly great job of regulating goods, of finding the appropriate costs and benefits.

The overwhelming, and I'd have to say 90, 95% of my research finds that when it's correct, it's behind the ball.

And when it's not correct, it can take another half a decade for people to really realize that.

So I don't want to, I'm hesitant to say the FDA is broken, right? The FDA is powerful.

I just recently, before coming on the show, I read an article saying that public trust for the FDA is about 50%.

So my confidence is lower, but public view of that tends to be a little bit higher.

But to say that half the people don't trust the Food and Drug Administration to bring safe and effective goods to market, That's one thing, but it's still incredibly powerful.

But the main reason I think that the FDA makes all of these mistakes continuously, and some of the ones we'll talk about, I'm sure, as we continue, is that there's no way to aggregate any of these things.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.