Aaron ZelikovichGuest
Isabella CicconeHost
Marco MeglioHost
It's very difficult to get commercial insurances to approve both because there is no evidence for it.

And there's little to no incentive for a company to be able to do a head-to-head comparison with their product versus their product and something else.

So we are really limited to answer this question based on real-world evidence.

And in order to generate the real-world evidence, We have to be really creative.

One option that we have is to have insurances, which some states where public insurances will allow this, more rarely will private insurances allow this, but having them commercially dosed with both at the same time.

The other population that is of interest are people who were in clinical trials of one of the treatments who are able to continue on the other therapy commercially.

And unfortunately, we're not really able to make generalized assumptions based off those data points.

In order to be able to justify the dual therapy, we need to be able to have data which currently we don't have.

And like you said, it's even tougher sometimes when these pharmaceutical companies don't want to obviously offer up some resources and kind of get extra trials off the ground.

I'm also curious, you know, when you're having conversations with families about, you know, dual therapy or just in general, how much does that come up from their side of things? And how do you kind of respond to families about where we currently stand with dual therapy?

It's very difficult to get commercial insurances to approve both because there is no evidence for it.

And there's little to no incentive for a company to be able to do a head-to-head comparison with their product versus their product and something else.

So we are really limited to answer this question based on real-world evidence.

And in order to generate the real-world evidence, We have to be really creative.

One option that we have is to have insurances, which some states where public insurances will allow this, more rarely will private insurances allow this, but having them commercially dosed with both at the same time.

The other population that is of interest are people who were in clinical trials of one of the treatments who are able to continue on the other therapy commercially.

And unfortunately, we're not really able to make generalized assumptions based off those data points.

In order to be able to justify the dual therapy, we need to be able to have data which currently we don't have.

And like you said, it's even tougher sometimes when these pharmaceutical companies don't want to obviously offer up some resources and kind of get extra trials off the ground.

I'm also curious, you know, when you're having conversations with families about, you know, dual therapy or just in general, how much does that come up from their side of things? And how do you kind of respond to families about where we currently stand with dual therapy?
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.