Sep 29, 2026 · 38 min · 12 segments
Send us your feedback In this episode of Election 2026, Partner and Head of our IP team…
Daniel FieldingGuestMichael O'BrienGuestWhy does the law care about election advertising in the first place, and why do we bother to have these specific rules around it at all?
It's a good question, Chris, and I think it's helpful to think about this by identifying first that the law responds to quote-unquote election advertising in two different and quite distinct ways.
First, there are a whole host of rules which apply to all advertising, including election advertising, for a wide range of very good reasons.
These include copyright protection, which doubtless you can speak to more confidently than me, but also things like accuracy, fairness, obscenity, and all the other usual things we care about for all ads.
And these are things that don't stop mattering just because the ad is about politics.

Well, there are also extra rules dealing with election advertising specifically.

And the reason why these ads are subject to additional rules is because they have the potential, I guess, to profoundly shape the way people think and feel about elections.

And ultimately, the way they behave on election day, this goes right to the heart of our democracy.

So it's important that we regulate these kinds of ads, particularly carefully, I guess.

This is becoming increasingly important for social media advertising, which allows politicians to really target tailored ads at various demographics more precisely, and I guess more powerfully than ever before.
We don't have time to cover off every rule, but presumably some of these are particularly relevant to election ads.
The first point, and this is, again, the thing you can speak more confidently to, the intellectual property risks.
And the second point worth covering off in this podcast are the complaints pathways.
Now, Dan and I can cover off the complaints pathways, but you're really our top expert on intellectual property.
So to that end, do you mind if I briefly take over your role and ask you the questions? Chris, what can you tell us about intellectual property risks in an election context?
Why does the law care about election advertising in the first place, and why do we bother to have these specific rules around it at all?
It's a good question, Chris, and I think it's helpful to think about this by identifying first that the law responds to quote-unquote election advertising in two different and quite distinct ways.
First, there are a whole host of rules which apply to all advertising, including election advertising, for a wide range of very good reasons.
These include copyright protection, which doubtless you can speak to more confidently than me, but also things like accuracy, fairness, obscenity, and all the other usual things we care about for all ads.
And these are things that don't stop mattering just because the ad is about politics.

Well, there are also extra rules dealing with election advertising specifically.

And the reason why these ads are subject to additional rules is because they have the potential, I guess, to profoundly shape the way people think and feel about elections.

And ultimately, the way they behave on election day, this goes right to the heart of our democracy.

So it's important that we regulate these kinds of ads, particularly carefully, I guess.

This is becoming increasingly important for social media advertising, which allows politicians to really target tailored ads at various demographics more precisely, and I guess more powerfully than ever before.
We don't have time to cover off every rule, but presumably some of these are particularly relevant to election ads.
The first point, and this is, again, the thing you can speak more confidently to, the intellectual property risks.
And the second point worth covering off in this podcast are the complaints pathways.
Now, Dan and I can cover off the complaints pathways, but you're really our top expert on intellectual property.
So to that end, do you mind if I briefly take over your role and ask you the questions? Chris, what can you tell us about intellectual property risks in an election context?
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.