Sam GilbertGuestKenzie Cooper-RyderHostIn a recent article, you and your co-author wrote, we find ourselves at a critical juncture in human history in which offloading opportunities are more salient than ever before.

I'd say is that offloading opportunities might be more salient, but the opportunities themselves are not new.

And I think that's something that does get lost in this debate a little bit, that offloading goes back so far in human history.

And we go through these cycles of people getting very interested in the latest form of technology, and then it becomes normalized, and then the cycle repeats.

And I think with AI, we're at an extreme moment of people paying a lot of attention to offloading technologies.

So certainly in the current discourse, there's a lot of interest in how does it change the way we think? How does it change the way that we are as human beings, the way that we use cognitive offloading? But I don't think it's really a new phenomenon.
When people talk about offloading as this new-on-the-scene phenomenon, do you think they're picking out a real pattern there where we're offloading more than we ever have before? Or is it just that, again, the technologies are kind of splashy and so they seem like this whole brave new world? I'm more on the splashy side of

So I don't think that there's a fundamental change in the way that we relate to cognitive offloading, but certainly people are very interested in it at the moment.

There are some reasons why you might think that the forms of offloading we engage in right now may be different in certain ways to earlier forms of offloading.

But I think also you need to remember that the fears about offloading go back almost as long as the technologies themselves.

Famously, we have Socrates warning that writing things down would make people forgetful.

So I think we hear a lot more in popular discourse about the dangers or the fears about offloading than we do about how normal it is.

So I find myself in this debate coming down on the normal side because I think it's really unbalanced right now.
Just briefly, there's probably a huge literature on this, but is that right? Does writing something down make you more likely to forget it?

I mean, here's a distinction that maybe we'll come back to later, but I think it's really important.
In a recent article, you and your co-author wrote, we find ourselves at a critical juncture in human history in which offloading opportunities are more salient than ever before.

I'd say is that offloading opportunities might be more salient, but the opportunities themselves are not new.

And I think that's something that does get lost in this debate a little bit, that offloading goes back so far in human history.

And we go through these cycles of people getting very interested in the latest form of technology, and then it becomes normalized, and then the cycle repeats.

And I think with AI, we're at an extreme moment of people paying a lot of attention to offloading technologies.

So certainly in the current discourse, there's a lot of interest in how does it change the way we think? How does it change the way that we are as human beings, the way that we use cognitive offloading? But I don't think it's really a new phenomenon.
When people talk about offloading as this new-on-the-scene phenomenon, do you think they're picking out a real pattern there where we're offloading more than we ever have before? Or is it just that, again, the technologies are kind of splashy and so they seem like this whole brave new world? I'm more on the splashy side of

So I don't think that there's a fundamental change in the way that we relate to cognitive offloading, but certainly people are very interested in it at the moment.

There are some reasons why you might think that the forms of offloading we engage in right now may be different in certain ways to earlier forms of offloading.

But I think also you need to remember that the fears about offloading go back almost as long as the technologies themselves.

Famously, we have Socrates warning that writing things down would make people forgetful.

So I think we hear a lot more in popular discourse about the dangers or the fears about offloading than we do about how normal it is.

So I find myself in this debate coming down on the normal side because I think it's really unbalanced right now.
Just briefly, there's probably a huge literature on this, but is that right? Does writing something down make you more likely to forget it?

I mean, here's a distinction that maybe we'll come back to later, but I think it's really important.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.