Ch. IV (pp. 22–24) – A new kind of thinking

This result is what most people begin with.

Coordinated processes.

Instead, we derive the fact that there are many processes, and that they become many in such a way that they are already coordinated.

Let me show this.

In our new model, the processes are originally and inherently coordinated.

In phases when a process is resumed, the rest of the body occurs only together with it.

Whenever that process is stopped, the rest of the body lives without it.

So the other processes have phases during which they are always together with this one process, all one with it, not differentiated from it, and other phases during which they have gone on and formed without it.

The processes may seem independent along their whole sequences, but they are different processes only during phases in which one went on without the other.

When a process goes on, it goes on together and with a lot of other processes.

Each phase of each process developed only together with some, but only without some others.

All the phases of each process developed during the stoppage of some others and only together with some others.

Therefore, how any one of them is at a certain moment is part of the bodily whole that includes just certain phases of the others.

we can now say the exact way a process is in each of its phases implies how the others are this is a fourth sense of imply i'm gonna stop you there yeah that's a good place for me to stop too and my reading of that like draws back these Images we were working with last time that feel fuzzy to me at this moment What i'm recalling like the music analogy metaphor um And something about, yeah, this like wrestling with the idea of one process versus multiple processes.

To what extent I can speak of a process outside of like the ongoing process.

I'm just kind of like noticing some of that like memory come in.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Was the last line of what you said, notice one process from another process? To what extent can you do that?

Yeah, to what extent can I do that? To what extent

can I speak about that? Yeah.

So one thing that's coming up for me that's like we're getting into like the lure, the lure of like something we know about reality and where it's like, oh, where does this fit in the model? What is your I, so to speak? Because you said notice a process from another process.

okay so you're like in a pro like what so that's like it is very interesting

yeah yeah you know there's curiosity about like the significance of that for you even as i say it there's something that comes for me around like i could frame it to what extent i'm able to speak of or notice processes versus framing it to what extent there is there are If I attempt to leave my eye out what does that do for me? I'm not quite so sure and it's

interesting