Aug 12, 2026 · 9 min · 7 segments
Welcome to the Skeptic’s Guide to Investment Management. In each episode, we examine one industry publication through a skeptical, logical, evidence-based lens, with the help of…
Tim McGlinnGuest
George AliferisHost
Today, I've got a brief discussion about a report put out by Neuberger Berman in early 2025.

Neuberger Berman is a large investment manager based in the US with over half a trillion dollars in assets under management.

And they put out a illustrative, you could say, report in early last year that discusses the potential benefits of putting alternative investments, aka private investments, into 401k plans.

And similar to other firms that have put out similar research, they do similar things.

In their case, they make some assumptions about private equity, which are quite extraordinary.

Specifically, they assume for 40 years that private equity, the private equity investments that they would choose would return over 15% per year after fees.

And that is in comparison to an assumed or expected US large cap return after fees of under 6%.

Their figures show that they'll end up with, it's certainly substantially more, even with just a 10% allocation, to private equity, that they'll have notably more money at retirement for the assumed investor as opposed to not having done it.

When you assume, so 5477 for US large cap, also a very strong underperformance compared to what has happened over the last few years.

But compared to a strong 15.30, we admire as well the precision there for private equity.

So how do they explain that, which are neither based on historical figures, nor on anything that we can easily comprehend.

Today, I've got a brief discussion about a report put out by Neuberger Berman in early 2025.

Neuberger Berman is a large investment manager based in the US with over half a trillion dollars in assets under management.

And they put out a illustrative, you could say, report in early last year that discusses the potential benefits of putting alternative investments, aka private investments, into 401k plans.

And similar to other firms that have put out similar research, they do similar things.

In their case, they make some assumptions about private equity, which are quite extraordinary.

Specifically, they assume for 40 years that private equity, the private equity investments that they would choose would return over 15% per year after fees.

And that is in comparison to an assumed or expected US large cap return after fees of under 6%.

Their figures show that they'll end up with, it's certainly substantially more, even with just a 10% allocation, to private equity, that they'll have notably more money at retirement for the assumed investor as opposed to not having done it.

When you assume, so 5477 for US large cap, also a very strong underperformance compared to what has happened over the last few years.

But compared to a strong 15.30, we admire as well the precision there for private equity.

So how do they explain that, which are neither based on historical figures, nor on anything that we can easily comprehend.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.