Jun 24, 2026 · 28 min · 12 segments
Dr. Jacquelyn Burkell is a Professor in the Faculty of Information & Media Studies at Western University and the IPC’s…
Jacqueline BurkellGuest
Patricia KosseimHost
Young people today are growing up in a digital world that's so fundamentally different than the one most of us as adults experienced.

What concerns you the most about the online environment children and youth are perceiving and navigating today?

As an information scientist and a cognitive psychologist, the thing that first comes to mind is the reality that youth today are operating in an information environment that is highly selected, highly personalized, quite frankly, deeply divided in ways that weren't historically true.

And intersecting with that is the reality that all of that personalization and that selection, that sort of constructed information environment that's around youth, is leveraging increasing amounts of personal information that they knowingly or inadvertently provide to media corporations that are interested, or others interested in having a hand in shaping that information environment.

You mentioned that children and teens are indeed encouraged to share more and more personal information online, where, I mean, we can include in that, uh, photos, location data, opinions, habits, friends lists.

What are the long-term implications of growing up under this constant pressure for more and more data collection?

Well, we started talking quite some time ago about data doubles, digital doubles, and I think that is the reality, that we don't even know how much information is being collected about us and what that information reveals.

And the other reality is what can be gleaned from the information we provide is becoming greater and greater.

Originally, if you posted a photograph online, it was a photograph online.

You posted it, it was kind of like having a photograph in an album, but a little more distributed album.

But then things started to happen, and you can apply facial recognition over that photograph to identify people in it who you didn't identify.

You can apply other kinds of analytics over the photograph to extract information from it about date and time and location.

You can link the photograph with other information about you or about the people that you're affiliating with in order to conclude more, to get a deeper insight into who you are.

So this is actually one of the things that Jane Bailey and I are thinking about in the Rethinking Consent project, and what motivated us to do that project was thinking about how it used to be, or it used to look simple when you revealed a piece of information, that it was a piece and it stood alone, and now it doesn't stand alone.

It is integrated with other material in order to provide greater information, allow greater inferences, and it implicates other people.

And I think these are all big changes that have big implications for privacy.

Young people today are growing up in a digital world that's so fundamentally different than the one most of us as adults experienced.

What concerns you the most about the online environment children and youth are perceiving and navigating today?

As an information scientist and a cognitive psychologist, the thing that first comes to mind is the reality that youth today are operating in an information environment that is highly selected, highly personalized, quite frankly, deeply divided in ways that weren't historically true.

And intersecting with that is the reality that all of that personalization and that selection, that sort of constructed information environment that's around youth, is leveraging increasing amounts of personal information that they knowingly or inadvertently provide to media corporations that are interested, or others interested in having a hand in shaping that information environment.

You mentioned that children and teens are indeed encouraged to share more and more personal information online, where, I mean, we can include in that, uh, photos, location data, opinions, habits, friends lists.

What are the long-term implications of growing up under this constant pressure for more and more data collection?

Well, we started talking quite some time ago about data doubles, digital doubles, and I think that is the reality, that we don't even know how much information is being collected about us and what that information reveals.

And the other reality is what can be gleaned from the information we provide is becoming greater and greater.

Originally, if you posted a photograph online, it was a photograph online.

You posted it, it was kind of like having a photograph in an album, but a little more distributed album.

But then things started to happen, and you can apply facial recognition over that photograph to identify people in it who you didn't identify.

You can apply other kinds of analytics over the photograph to extract information from it about date and time and location.

You can link the photograph with other information about you or about the people that you're affiliating with in order to conclude more, to get a deeper insight into who you are.

So this is actually one of the things that Jane Bailey and I are thinking about in the Rethinking Consent project, and what motivated us to do that project was thinking about how it used to be, or it used to look simple when you revealed a piece of information, that it was a piece and it stood alone, and now it doesn't stand alone.

It is integrated with other material in order to provide greater information, allow greater inferences, and it implicates other people.

And I think these are all big changes that have big implications for privacy.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.