Aug 12, 2026 · 41 min · 8 segments
Iyad Rahwan is the Director of the Center for Humans and Machines at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development. He is a pioneer in the emerging fields of machine behavior and machine culture, in…
Iyad RahwanGuest
David Sloan WilsonHostThat was published in 2019, but it really reflects a lot of work on your part.
Behaviors are always enacted in environments, and the ecology of AI is really like the ecology of a multi-species communities with all the interactions and so on.
Let's bring in multi-level selection in the concept of major evolutionary transitions.
a topic dear to my own heart, but I'd love to hear from you as to why it's important to distinguish levels of selection and also this idea of major evolutionary transitions in which a unit becomes so highly cooperative that it becomes endowed with the properties of a single organism.

Yes, so maybe I should just build a bridge to this concept by saying that in my own research and in other people's research, we're working at different levels, right? So we're looking at different kinds of questions.

So for instance, we recently had a paper showing that when people delegate tasks to AI agents, they are more likely to cheat on those tasks.

So that's a very kind of proximate behavior that we were able to observe and quantify experimentally.

So if maybe you want to fire somebody or you want to maybe write a fake review of a product and you can delegate it to an AI, you're more willing to do that.

Now we can think about, well, why did this behavior evolve or emerge? Or perhaps the AI allows you this kind of affordance, doesn't push back, unlike your friend who might say, look, no, I'm not going to do this for you.

And then you can start thinking, well, in what sort of ecology? Well, first of all, what happens if this becomes so prevalent? Everybody now has a kind of minions that do their dirty work for them.

So you can start projecting or speculating about like these more ecosystem level consequences of

well, what sort of ecology or what sort of environmental conditions should I create to prevent this kind of behavior? So, for example, perhaps we should audit delegation to AI agents and then impose consequences on them so that people feel a real kind of reputational consequences or even maybe financial consequences.


And the question now becomes, well, under what conditions can we make AIs more prosocial or more like moral or ethical or legal.
That was published in 2019, but it really reflects a lot of work on your part.
Behaviors are always enacted in environments, and the ecology of AI is really like the ecology of a multi-species communities with all the interactions and so on.
Let's bring in multi-level selection in the concept of major evolutionary transitions.
a topic dear to my own heart, but I'd love to hear from you as to why it's important to distinguish levels of selection and also this idea of major evolutionary transitions in which a unit becomes so highly cooperative that it becomes endowed with the properties of a single organism.

Yes, so maybe I should just build a bridge to this concept by saying that in my own research and in other people's research, we're working at different levels, right? So we're looking at different kinds of questions.

So for instance, we recently had a paper showing that when people delegate tasks to AI agents, they are more likely to cheat on those tasks.

So that's a very kind of proximate behavior that we were able to observe and quantify experimentally.

So if maybe you want to fire somebody or you want to maybe write a fake review of a product and you can delegate it to an AI, you're more willing to do that.

Now we can think about, well, why did this behavior evolve or emerge? Or perhaps the AI allows you this kind of affordance, doesn't push back, unlike your friend who might say, look, no, I'm not going to do this for you.

And then you can start thinking, well, in what sort of ecology? Well, first of all, what happens if this becomes so prevalent? Everybody now has a kind of minions that do their dirty work for them.

So you can start projecting or speculating about like these more ecosystem level consequences of

well, what sort of ecology or what sort of environmental conditions should I create to prevent this kind of behavior? So, for example, perhaps we should audit delegation to AI agents and then impose consequences on them so that people feel a real kind of reputational consequences or even maybe financial consequences.


And the question now becomes, well, under what conditions can we make AIs more prosocial or more like moral or ethical or legal.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.