Global Intelligence Weekly Wrap up
Oct 9, 2026 · 30 min · 8 segments
Send us Fan Mail 🕵️ Why Are Spies Breaking Bad? | Global Intelligence Weekly Wrap-Up A Canadian NATO intern accused of espionage. A former German…
Neil BissonHost
We begin in Canada, where an alleged espionage case at NATO is raising an uncomfortable question.

How effectively does our security screening system identify and deal with the warning signs of compromise? On October fifth, Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree appeared before the House of Commons Public Safety and National Security Committee.


Belgian authorities arrested the woman on July twenty-fourth of this year on allegations of espionage for a third country in participation in a criminal organization.

She worked at the Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe, or SHAPE, in Mons, Belgium.

Associated Press reported that NATO security services raised concerns with Belgian military intelligence leading to the investigation.

CBC identified the suspect as Baiwei Zhang, also known professionally as Claire Zhang.


In twenty twenty-three, the Public Service Commission found that Zhang committed fraud in a Canada Border Service Agency appointment process.

The reported conduct involved applications under different names and email addresses without subsequently clarifying that they came from the same person.

The Federal Court dismissed her application for judicial review in twenty twenty-four.

Despite the fact that this was an appointment process finding, it brings into question the integrity of the applicant and should have also been a potential red flag in her application for her work with NATO.

Although her dishonesty in an appointment process does not establish espionage, it is relevant in assessing reliability and trust.

One, when was the clearance granted? Two, what information was available? Three, who received the fraud funding? And four, how was it assessed? Without those answers, we can't determine whether the problem involved missing information, poor information sharing, an inadequate assessment or developments after screening.

Sponsoring department or agency themselves makes the decision to grant, deny, suspend, or revoke a clearance.

CSIS also provides assessment concerning Canadians seeking sensitive positions with international organizations, including NATO.

That means accountability requires examination of the entire chain, from the information collected to the final decision and the subsequent management of access.

Listeners may recognize the broader issue from our December twelfth, twenty twenty-five episode.

In that segment on Canadian military intelligence member Master Warrant Officer Matthew Robar, we examined charges alleging the unauthorized communication of safeguarded defense information to a foreign entity.

We begin in Canada, where an alleged espionage case at NATO is raising an uncomfortable question.

How effectively does our security screening system identify and deal with the warning signs of compromise? On October fifth, Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree appeared before the House of Commons Public Safety and National Security Committee.


Belgian authorities arrested the woman on July twenty-fourth of this year on allegations of espionage for a third country in participation in a criminal organization.

She worked at the Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe, or SHAPE, in Mons, Belgium.

Associated Press reported that NATO security services raised concerns with Belgian military intelligence leading to the investigation.

CBC identified the suspect as Baiwei Zhang, also known professionally as Claire Zhang.


In twenty twenty-three, the Public Service Commission found that Zhang committed fraud in a Canada Border Service Agency appointment process.

The reported conduct involved applications under different names and email addresses without subsequently clarifying that they came from the same person.

The Federal Court dismissed her application for judicial review in twenty twenty-four.

Despite the fact that this was an appointment process finding, it brings into question the integrity of the applicant and should have also been a potential red flag in her application for her work with NATO.

Although her dishonesty in an appointment process does not establish espionage, it is relevant in assessing reliability and trust.

One, when was the clearance granted? Two, what information was available? Three, who received the fraud funding? And four, how was it assessed? Without those answers, we can't determine whether the problem involved missing information, poor information sharing, an inadequate assessment or developments after screening.

Sponsoring department or agency themselves makes the decision to grant, deny, suspend, or revoke a clearance.

CSIS also provides assessment concerning Canadians seeking sensitive positions with international organizations, including NATO.

That means accountability requires examination of the entire chain, from the information collected to the final decision and the subsequent management of access.

Listeners may recognize the broader issue from our December twelfth, twenty twenty-five episode.

In that segment on Canadian military intelligence member Master Warrant Officer Matthew Robar, we examined charges alleging the unauthorized communication of safeguarded defense information to a foreign entity.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.