Jun 11, 2026 · 1 hr 31 min · 18 segments
SPONSORS - Support the show: Hungryroot - Get 40% off your first order plus a free item in every box for life. Go to https://www.hungryroot.com/gj and use code GJ Shopify - Start your $1/month trial…
But anyway, regardless, it was a good week for me.
I know that you pride yourself on impartiality on your content and just trying to present the facts of the case instead of inserting your own opinion.
Have you considered with this case, this is the case where they're not streaming.
Correct.
And that you don't have access to the documents.
To the transcripts.
Have you considered giving opinions? The only say your thoughts on it.
Add another thought.
It's hard to have an
opinion when I don't have fact based.
Right.
Like everything.
This is why I hate doing it this way, because journalists try to be impartial.
But regardless, there's going to be some lens there.
So I am getting information from your lens and then adding my lens on top of that.
It feels so removed from what actually happened that I actually hate it.
But as I was reading the jury instructions this morning, I was thinking about doing like the jurors are deliberating.
The things they're deliberating is murder.
Yeah, I think that's a good idea.
Manslaughter or acquittal and then going through.
kind of what I've been able to see.
It's just so hard when you don't have what
actually was said, you know? I thought that, I think that's actually a good idea.
So people have an understanding of at least, I actually think it's quite interesting to hear what the juror instructions are.
I was going to say the problem with opinions is that it is an opinion and that does get a little bit murky.
But anyway, regardless, it was a good week for me.
I know that you pride yourself on impartiality on your content and just trying to present the facts of the case instead of inserting your own opinion.
Have you considered with this case, this is the case where they're not streaming.
Correct.
And that you don't have access to the documents.
To the transcripts.
Have you considered giving opinions? The only say your thoughts on it.
Add another thought.
It's hard to have an
opinion when I don't have fact based.
Right.
Like everything.
This is why I hate doing it this way, because journalists try to be impartial.
But regardless, there's going to be some lens there.
So I am getting information from your lens and then adding my lens on top of that.
It feels so removed from what actually happened that I actually hate it.
But as I was reading the jury instructions this morning, I was thinking about doing like the jurors are deliberating.
The things they're deliberating is murder.
Yeah, I think that's a good idea.
Manslaughter or acquittal and then going through.
kind of what I've been able to see.
It's just so hard when you don't have what
actually was said, you know? I thought that, I think that's actually a good idea.
So people have an understanding of at least, I actually think it's quite interesting to hear what the juror instructions are.
I was going to say the problem with opinions is that it is an opinion and that does get a little bit murky.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.